Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk
Delivery-date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:42:53 +0000
Message-ID: <43C15D1D.9060001@freenet.de>
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:42:37 +0000
From: Wolf DL4YHF <dl4yhf@freenet.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <000c01c61465$10909100$3ce8fc3e@l8p8y6> <153285202.20060108162939@t-online.de>
In-Reply-To: <153285202.20060108162939@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: LF: Beacon
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Hello Hartmut,

it was RU6LA who had a cracking signal in North DL - audible and almost 
as strong as M0BMU (who, besides some others, worked Ed).
About DK7KO :  He's on for some years now, but only sends endless beacon 
loops in normal CW near 137 kHz. Fortunately he doesn't do this on 136.5 
kHz (which was the famous "Ropex" frequency in the past). He rarely 
makes real QSO, instead wants to receive reports via telephone.

73,
 Wolf DL4YHF

(thanks to the amazing number of stations I could work from DK4U today, 
most of them being on the reflector)


Hartmut Wolff schrieb:

>>DK7KO in beacon mode 137.0 khz. Good signal. Try a CQ for a report
>>there is a lot of acty around the freq.
>>    
>>
>
> DK7KO must be new on LF. Not seen here today.
>
> A RU station was calling on 137.700 a few minutes ago. But could not
> get the full call because DJ6GT is testing his QRSS exactly on the
> same frequency. He was testing the past week every day for some
> hours.
>
> Hartmut
>
>
>
>
>  
>