Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk
Delivery-date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 11:24:25 +0100
Message-ID: <435B648E.2070000@usa.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 12:23:10 +0200
From: Alberto di Bene <dibene@usa.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <200509141911.29583.valerio@mailsrv.dii.unisi.it> <001201c5b952$a37f1a40$ee9bfea9@oben> <4358F4D5.8030503@usa.net> <000001c5d665$075cf260$107e7ad5@Main> <435A36D7.1080105@usa.net> <001501c5d72a$13589d60$045bfea9@d4f8d8> <002301c5d760$04653120$e9308351@Main>
In-Reply-To: <002301c5d760$04653120$e9308351@Main>
Z-USANET-MsgId: XID150JJwkXe0072X36
Subject: LF: Re: Wellbrook ALA-1530 active loop
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Alan Melia wrote:
> Maybe we should shout it Andy  as in SECRET !!
> Alan

Well, the message got through, so the culprit is not that word...
Let me try once again, maybe changing some suspect words of my
previous message(s).

-----------------------------

Hi Alan,

  well, I am not that interested in the details about how the loop itself is built,
but instead on the low IP3 preamplifier... but I received a private note from 
an owner of that active loop telling that the circuitry is potted up so getting 
at the schematic is virtually impossible...

No, I haven't seen the preamp on the latest issue of Lowdown, as I don't subscribe
to it. Would it be a serious breach of the fair play code to send me just that
schematic ?   :-) 

73  Alberto  I2PHD
---------------------------------------
Alan Melia wrote:

>> Hi Alberto, well the guys on the AOR 7030 group seem to rate it as well, but
>> what are they comparing it with ?? that is the question. Surely there is not
>> much secret in loops these days, but when I looked at some of these aerials
>> I found that there were no definitive measurements.
>> [snip]