Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk
Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:58:30 +0100
Message-ID: <43541E5F.1000906@zen.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:57:51 +0100
From: Stewart Bryant <zen27607@zen.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <004601c5d360$0fab1a80$f500a8c0@Dell5150>
In-Reply-To: <004601c5d360$0fab1a80$f500a8c0@Dell5150>
Subject: Re: LF: RE: Recording of Rugby Loran-C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

A minute or so would be good. Before & after would be very
good.

Thanks

Stewart

Dave Pick wrote:

>Stewart
>
>How much of it would you like?!
>
>I can do you a wav file.
>I think I've got some "before" recordings too.
>
>Dave G3YXM 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant
>Sent: 17 October 2005 21:00
>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>Subject: LF: Recording of Rugby Loran-C
>
>Has anyone got a recording of the effect of the Rugby Loran-C on the 136KHz
>band?
>
>I am at the International Telecoms Synchronisation Forum where NPL were
>talking about Loran-C as a possible alternative to GPS for frequency
>reference. When I asked the speaker about the pollution he said that he
>thought it was confined to +/- 10KHz, and was quite surprised when I
>explained about 136KHz. Interestingly someone from the BBC spoke to me
>afterward and said that there was a problem with interference with Radio4 in
>the Rugby area, that was attributable to the Loran-C Tx.
>
>Anyway, if anyone has a recording I will play it to the NPL speaker to show
>him what is going on.
>
>73
>
>Stewart
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>