Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk
Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 16:16:35 +0100
Message-ID: <43453FB5.3050008@hifidelity.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 15:16:05 +0000
From: Steve Dove <dsp@hifidelity.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <003701c5ca73$c31af220$6901a8c0@AIRPORTTERMINAL> <000d01c5ca83$bbdee240$6901a8c0@AIRPORTTERMINAL>
In-Reply-To: <000d01c5ca83$bbdee240$6901a8c0@AIRPORTTERMINAL>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: VA7LF
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Dear VA7LF, and all who sail in her,

I concur with Jay about the frequency shift, or perhaps it 
was the 'other end'  -  we can but live in hope . . .

On w3eee.com, under 'Argo Gallery', are three snapshots from 
'Grabulator II' last night; the first a big bright nearly 
complete 'VA7LF', the last a still recognizable 'VA7LF' but 
weaker and down in frequency somewhat.  The middle capture 
shows the tail-end of the first (the lower frequency of the 
DFCW pair) and the beginning of the second one, giving an 
idea of the offset.

Great job, fellas!

         Cheers,

                 Steve


Jay Rusgrove wrote:

 > VA7LF ops
 >
 > Just noticed on the 'after sun up' capture that the 
signal had moved down in frequency. Until then all VA7LF 
transmissions have been consistently on the same 
frequency...assuming that is your time slot and signal of 
course...
 > Jay


-- 
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 267.11.9 - Release Date: 09/29/05