Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E7ED7380000E7; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:54:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TisMc-0000Hq-Hz for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:53:06 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TisMc-0000Hh-3v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:53:06 +0000 Received: from smtpout5.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.80] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TisMa-0000OA-3l for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:53:05 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.26.46.129]) by mwinf5d64 with ME id ajsg1k00g2nDipe03jsh9A; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:52:43 +0100 Message-ID: <42E2127EB4DA450A9EEFFB4C8C281E3A@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <50C78875.5050005@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50C86B5F.40206@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <004501cdd875$7feaf410$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <004501cdd875$7feaf410$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:52:40 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I thought a Crocodile was well suited to MF , did not Captain Hook's one have an alarm clock inside that ticked ? ideal for jt/wspr /mm ? G.. From: "mal hamilton" Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 2:32 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: HB9ASB [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.80 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE X-Scan-Signature: 0b36c952c26be93e626fe2fa1c93657f Subject: Re: LF: HB9ASB Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db40750c8e0e70db4 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none I thought a Crocodile was well suited to MF , did not Captain Hook's one have an alarm clock inside that ticked ? ideal for jt/wspr /mm ? G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: "mal hamilton" Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 2:32 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: HB9ASB > If you cannot hear them you cannot work them, a good RX is essential at > all > times. > A large TX in BROADCAST or BEACON mode causes interference to others a > GOOD > RX DOES NOT > A while back I was working an Italian stn on 500 Khz when an Amateur > Beacon > started up and almost wiped out the QSO. The Beacon Operator either had no > RX on the frequency or did not check for acty before transmitting. This > has > happened several times, especially on MF > I often can hear a number of stns calling CQ on MF normally German stns > but > they cannot hear each other but I can hear them all. I assume there is a > RX > problem. > Alligators are not popular on Amateur Radio frequencies, especially the > Beacon type > > de g3kev > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stefan Schäfer" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:32 AM > Subject: Re: LF: HB9ASB > > > Hi Toni, > > Am 12.12.2012 09:23, schrieb traumwandler@sensemail.ch: >> [...]I'm sorry to say, but right now you are a big crocodile on the >> band ;-) > > Why sorry? I like to be a crocodile. I have no problem about that :-) > There is nothing negative about that. It is the same as having a good RX > system and a poor TX system, which applies for much more of the stations > available ;-) > > 73, Stefan > > > >> 73 de Toni >> >>> Preferred mode CW and SSB, no digital mode or similar computergames! >>> No fake QSO’s!< >> >> >> Am 11.12.2012 20:24, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: >>> Toni, >>> >>> I guess that was you, answering to my call in CW? Sorry, i didn't >>> listen to the band in that moment. The peak hold graph also indicates >>> that the S/N was to low for CW reception. This must have to do with >>> some new QRM in the background. The QRM interacts with the strength of >>> HGA22. That's why expect that i will have much better LF reception >>> with my new RX concept which is on the plan since a longer time. >>> However i'm waiting for the mixer (SBL-3) from the US since several >>> weeks. Hopefully soon... >>> >>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > >