Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp71536pad; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 21:29:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.182.228 with SMTP id eh4mr1015992wic.45.1379651347489; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 21:29:07 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d8si566235wie.19.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 21:29:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail header.i=@yahoo.co.jp Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VMrt8-00023Z-DM for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 05:00:14 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VMrt7-00023Q-M5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 05:00:13 +0100 Received: from web100003.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp ([114.111.98.177]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VMrt4-0005sk-3o for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 05:00:12 +0100 Received: (qmail 40928 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Sep 2013 03:59:59 -0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=yahoo.co.jp Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.jp; s=yj20110701; t=1379649599; bh=U/NxdprTW1TaU/ZdNocc/COvOZ2ZI7yqMxAruP1mS18=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=o1t6mBWjCDcoL9bco9LTgP6CdoI+EiGu1mx8hVHBeTvgtuhF3OSfBTqpfRsNzAuKEcC6rDcc+f6YTRyya/67CZ2V934K9mjLAYpby8+jjnw3o74nwHwmLuFEE2TvS8imQGttDQsk/GaQZADP1RWVQxxEZxc8Knh+BHNWsjBBZr8= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=yj20110701; d=yahoo.co.jp; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ht6MQ8vQvBrRQs7QKVTSsuQr9ION+wZrMP19sOihjRgbc6dF84G9NJ+l7WnEXsTwx/GottFGOYLvrhu5r6E15WPzHSFSDtNefq3lbabro8Lo5buS47Gt6a5F4AaU77AbnYWoskfVEvjFCP86iY+NfwfWCelYGZReLkvYksBti6I=; Message-ID: <429958.36789.qm@web100003.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> X-YMail-OSG: Tnboc6QVM1nmRz1QNteBO0UA2.mWGn26khdpw9YgyVAmPId8JxixghPNKCXuqH.XRXQfs.PElO4j_S0tepzYWvQQY44lm9fP53jY5W1U0fqhYLnXgvHikJtpY9b9w3vdpGS1yCzZL6IXA5oCf5EkGf9.lwpMvF5KwwJOJgJdoaBbXRYzt_CZ925vzKxKBWbP0chxLEAR2wMJobBbK1N9TukWQpZ2fYzzvH8PJkBb8ZkV3bIcYsmhuiiUwqQ5d3gkiNFkXFkatEtDv_N7E8cSl7x8TcSNiDQSHSIR4BgJx4ZmUiACNVv_80vC6IuwEIxp6t.S5ZihSp_HAGNdxkF.v.gnxOgGJk93lBqFBhrJL6D7f_0mNeULaCEPUnZR8gck7cKgmY7TaxRqgwkS7VPnwaXYL.XAbIMFaeFW4Q1crk_7WrUEWWTq25G.ExpdnAgBt2hDtZ9Lnj_NU9u4pJ..qs59 Received: from [27.142.100.197] by web100003.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp via HTTP; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:59:58 JST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.111_48 References: <3B3EC333E2DA4C43A9B9D343016D9CE0@SV8CSHP> <612130.72860.qm@web100005.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> <523B42FA.5090801@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <103301.39058.qm@web100002.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> <523B4827.70107@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:59:58 +0900 (JST) From: Knight Ao To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: <523B4827.70107@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, Thanks for txing! Condx this morning over here were not so good as far as DCF39 was concerned. Yesterday morning was better. Please keep watching on my grabber for DCF39, and fire up your big gun [...] Content analysis details: (-0.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [114.111.98.177 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (ja10xx[at]yahoo.co.jp) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 982d53dbb4bb82e9ed4f38562b2a1556 Subject: Re: LF: UA0SNV Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-648126088-1379649598=:36789" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3086 --0-648126088-1379649598=:36789 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stefan,=0A=0AThanks for txing!=A0 Condx this morning over here were not = so good =0A=0Aas far as DCF39 was concerned.=A0 Yesterday morning was bette= r.=0APlease keep watching on my grabber for DCF39, and fire up your big gun= =0A=0Aoccasionally when you have time.=0A=0AIn the meantime, thanks for he= lping Spiros set up his grabber.=A0 Seems=0Aworking pretty good. =0A=0A=0A7= 3's,=0A=0A=0AYas - JA8SCD=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message -----=0A>= From: Stefan Sch=E4fer =0A>To: rsgb_= lf_group@blacksheep.org =0A>Date: 2013/9/20, Fri 03:53=0A>Subject: Re: LF: = UA0SNV=0A> =0A>=0A>Hi Yas, =0A>=0A>10 minutes for your answer! That is fast= international communication :-)=0A>=0A>Yes, i fired up a few minutes ago. = DFCW-180, just to match your grabber=0Asettings. I already checked your gra= bber and saw that DCF-39 was=0Apeaking better than 20 dB SNR last night. Th= at is odd, because the=0Apropagation appeared to be rather worse (no WSPR-1= 5 decode by UA0SNV).=0AWell, we will see :-)=0A>=0A>Oh, i can see something= on Spiros' grabber :-)=0A>=0A>73, Stefan/DK7FC=0A>=0A>=0A>Am 19.09.2013 20= :41, schrieb Knight Ao: =0A>Hi Stefan,=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>The links is:=0A>>http= ://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/76751319/137.jpg=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>You wanna als= o fire up at 136172 now?=A0 I changed my RX ant=0Ayesterday, and it seems t= o be 3-5 dB =0A>>=0A>>better in SNR than the previous one.=A0 =0A>>=0A>>=0A= >>=0A>>GL!=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>Yas=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>----- Original=0A= Message -----=0A>>>From: Stefan Sch=E4fer =0A>>>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org =0A>>>Date: 2013/9/20, Fri=0A0= 3:31=0A>>>Subject: LF: UA0SNV=0A>>> =0A>>>=0A>>>Yas, =0A>>>=0A>>>What is th= e current link to the UA0SNV grabber? I assume it has=0Achanged...=0A>>>=0A= >>>73, Stefan/DK7FC=0A>>>=0A>>>=0A>>>Am 19.09.2013 20:02, schrieb Knight Ao= : =0A>>>HI Spiros and all,=0A>>>>=0A>>>>=0A>>>>JA7NI has started firing up = DFCW at 137,779 now. It's=0Abeen=0Ashowing up at UA0SNV's grabber already. = For last couple of weeks, the=0Acondx have been quite good.=A0 Hope you guy= s in EU can copy him. The best=0Atime should be around 19-20UTC.=A0 (20:30U= TC is the sunrise here.)=0A>>>>=0A>>>>=0A>>>>=0A>>>>GL!=0A>>>>=0A>>>>=0A>>>= >Yas - JA8SCD Tokyo=0A>>>>=0A>>>>>=0A>>>=0A>>>=0A>=0A> --0-648126088-1379649598=:36789 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Stefan,

Thanks for txing!  Condx this morning over = here were not so good
as far as DCF39 was conce= rned.  Yesterday morning was better.
Please keep watc= hing on my grabber for DCF39, and fire up your big gun
occas= ionally when you have time.

In the meantime, thank= s for helping Spiros set up his grabber.  Seems
working pret= ty good.

73's,


<= /div>
Yas - JA8SCD



= ----- Original Messag= e -----
From: Stefan Sch=E4fer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
= To: rsgb_lf_g= roup@blacksheep.org
Date: 2013/9/20, Fri 03:53
= Subject: Re: LF: UA0SNV

=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A=0A =0AHi Yas,
=0A
=0A10 minutes for your answ= er! That is fast international communication :-)
=0A
=0AYes, i fired = up a few minutes ago. DFCW-180, just to match your grabber=0Asettings. I al= ready checked your grabber and saw that DCF-39 was=0Apeaking better than 20= dB SNR last night. That is odd, because the=0Apropagation appeared to be r= ather worse (no WSPR-15 decode by UA0SNV).=0AWell, we will see :-)
=0A=0AOh, i can see something on Spiros' grabber :-)
=0A
=0A73, Stefan= /DK7FC
=0A
=0A
=0AAm 19.09.2013 20:41, schrieb Knight Ao:=0A=0A
=0A
Hi Stefan,
=0A

=0A <= span>
=0A
The links is:
=0A =0A
=0A
=0A
You wanna also fire up at 136172 = now?  I changed my RX ant=0Ayesterday, and it seems to be 3-5 dB
= =0A
=0A
better in SNR than the previous one. = ;
=0A
=0A

=0A
=0A
GL!
=0A

=0A
=0A
Ya= s
=0A
=0A

=0A
=0A

=0A
=0A
=0A
=0A
<= font face=3D"Arial" size=3D"2"> ----- Original=0AMessage -----
=0A From: Stefan Sch=E4fer=0A<Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelb= erg.de>
=0A To:=0Arsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
=0A = Date: 2013/9/20, Fri=0A03= :31
=0A Subject: LF: = UA0SNV
=0A
=0A
=0A
= Yas,
=0A
=0AWhat is the current link to the UA0SNV grabber? I a= ssume it has=0Achanged...
=0A
=0A73, Stefan/DK7FC
=0A
= =0A
=0AAm 19.09.2013 20:02, schrieb Knight Ao:=0A
=0A
=0A
HI Spiros and all,
=0A
=0A
=0A
JA7NI has started firi= ng up DFCW at 137,779 now. It's=0Abeen=0Ashowing up at UA0SNV's grabber alr= eady. For last couple of weeks, the=0Acondx have been quite good.  Hop= e you guys in EU can copy him. The best=0Atime should be around 19-20UTC.&n= bsp; (20:30UTC is the sunrise here.)
=0A
=0A
=0A
=0A
GL!
=0A =

=0A
=0A
Yas - JA8SCD To= kyo
=0A
=0A
= =0A

=0A
=0A
=0A
=0A =0A
=0A =0A
=0A
=0A
= =0A
=0A
=0A =0A
=0A
=0A=0A =0A=0A


--0-648126088-1379649598=:36789--