Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Tue, 24 May 2005 18:52:25 +0100 Received: by ptb-mxcore04.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DadZo-0000i1-4P for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 24 May 2005 18:52:24 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore04.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DadZn-0000hA-UM for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 24 May 2005 18:52:24 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DadZU-0006cX-KG for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 18:52:04 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DadZU-0006cO-4y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 18:52:04 +0100 Received: from mout0.freenet.de ([194.97.50.131]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DadZS-00081Z-Oq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 18:52:04 +0100 Received: from [194.97.50.138] (helo=mx0.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1DadZF-0000ZB-NJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 19:51:49 +0200 Received: from td9091daf.pool.terralink.de ([217.9.29.175] helo=[192.168.0.200]) by mx0.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.51 #1) id 1DadZF-0007L0-Ec for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 19:51:49 +0200 Message-ID: <429369EB.4060701@freenet.de> Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 19:52:43 +0200 From: Wolf DL4YHF User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <003001c5603e$24e42ee0$1101a8c0@w2ksn> In-Reply-To: <003001c5603e$24e42ee0$1101a8c0@w2ksn> X-Warning: 217.9.29.175 is listed at list.dsbl.org X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 194.97.50.131 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of freenet.de Subject: Re: LF: reception with multiple antennas Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Hi Stewart, An impressive idea - sounds a bit like radio astronomy on LF, using an interferometer ! One problem I see for a practical implementation is the internet connection - last not least because on some quiet "remote" sites there is no internet at all, or only through a slow modem connection. I played with the windows socket services some time ago, trying to get a reliable audio link in "almost real time" running, but got entangled in red tape... it may be simpler these days, but I honestly haven't got a clue yet. For a start, we either try to exchange the audio samples as simple decimated audio files (via manual or automated cyclic FTP, etc), or find someone with in-depth experience in WAN / internet programming. Another, possibly simpler "local" approach which would not rely on the internet, is using cheap FM links to combine signals received from various receiving sites separated a few dozen kilometers from each other, and use a PC / soundcard with multiple inputs. This would allow almost-real-time reception, good for two-way CW attempts ;-) For the test recordings, which file format would you prefer ... bandwidth / sampling rate, complex or real sample pairs, etc ? I wanted to add a decimated audio logging feature in the WOLF GUI, possibly using the JASON file format (which is supported by at least two other programs already), or something in that style. The next chance to make a few recordings would be on Thursday evening, or next weekend, though the "QRN forecast" doesn't look very promising. 73, Wolf DL4YHF .