Return-Path: Received: (qmail 76884 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2005 11:08:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore04.plus.net with SMTP; 13 Apr 2005 11:08:50 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DLflq-0000OR-Tq for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:10:58 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.4] (helo=ptb-mxcore04.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DLflq-0000OO-Ra for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:10:58 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore04.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DLfke-0002SF-Qn for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:09:44 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DLfjO-0006Cu-Q7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:08:26 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DLfjO-0006Cl-D2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:08:26 +0100 Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net ([165.212.64.31]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLfjL-0008Ml-Jy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:08:26 +0100 Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net (cmsout01.mbox.net [165.212.64.31]) by cmsout01.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC2C7818D for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:08:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from uadvg129.cms.usa.net [165.212.11.129] by cmsout01.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.21U); Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:08:11 GMT X-USANET-Source: 165.212.11.129 IN dibene@usa.net uadvg129.cms.usa.net X-USANET-MsgId: XID586JDmLiL6404X01 Received: from [192.168.0.2] [151.46.39.147] by uadvg129.cms.usa.net (ASMTP/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.21E) with ESMTP id 588JDmLiJ0410M29; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:08:09 GMT X-USANET-Auth: 151.46.39.147 AUTH dibene@usa.net [192.168.0.2] Message-ID: <425CFD9F.2050608@usa.net> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:08:15 +0200 From: Alberto di Bene User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000701c53f43$2e3dd4d0$5f4136d2@mcalevey> <5.1.0.14.0.20050412154826.02288930@u0019445.kuleuven.be> <425BFCE8.9010004@usa.net> <1113338168.425c31390202f@webmail2.kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <1113338168.425c31390202f@webmail2.kuleuven.be> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Z-USANET-MsgId: XID588JDmLik0410X29 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 165.212.64.31 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of usa.net X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: LF: Re: How to easily cross the Pond ? (was : G3AQC in ZL) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Rik, probably your idea would work, but I think that if you can achieve phase coherence then the best technique would be to compute the two correlations between the received signal and what the signal should be in case either of a "1" or of a "0", then select the symbol that gives the highest correlation value. And. if you have CPU cycles to spare, which probably is the case for low signaling rates, then you could even correct for small phase errors by computing several correlation sums, each shifted by a few degrees, finding then the peak. And adding a convolutional FEC coding with a soft-decision Viterbi decoder would certainly be of no harm... 73 Alberto I2PHD ------------------------------------------------------- Rik Strobbe wrote: >Hello Alberto, > >phase coherence maybe a bit tricky. >I am not a mathematic expert, but just intuitive I would say that >knowing the exact time of begin and end of a dot could be used to >improve SNR. > >One possibility that comes to my mind : >Assume >* a series of dot sequence (let's say 5 = .....) >* a dot length of 1 minute >* each dot starts exactly at the full minute >Now take one FFT every second, with the samples from the last 60 >seconds. the subsequent FFT's should show a triangular wave that has a >period of 2 minutes and is in phase to the minute rytme. >Maybe using the right technique (kind of FFT of the FFT ?) one could >detect this 2 minute triangular wave at signal levels that are to weak >to bring up the dots with ARGO or similar software. > >Makes this sense or it is just a stupid idea ? > >73, Rik > >