Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C28C5380000F3; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:29:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TR3o2-0002ZB-SR for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:27:46 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TR3o2-0002Z2-Fe for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:27:46 +0100 Received: from smtpout4.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.68] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TR3o0-0000J0-5Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:27:45 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.21.105]) by mwinf5d49 with ME id F4Tg1k00G2G1zca034TgEf; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:27:43 +0200 Message-ID: <418E090825C04DFB81593EA54244F640@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <508715CE.3000701@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <0D53475605DF40F08BF596E29708823E@AGB> <5087BF86.5010804@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <5087BF86.5010804@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:27:40 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan, All the spots should still be in the psk-map data base ? May be the path east was better , as you have the same s/n over similar distance , where as east is over land ? [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.68 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE X-Scan-Signature: 290c8768709872f914a4ca71ad6bfe49 Subject: Re: LF: OP32 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-15"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410c50881753661e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stefan, All the spots should still be in the psk-map data base ? May be the path east was better , as you have the same s/n over similar distance , where as east is over land ? UA0AET is showing as decoding at JA at the moment , may be now is a good time to try Tx while JA is in darkness UA0AET JA8SCD 2200m OPERA 4163 kms 13:53:08 73 -G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Stefan Schäfer" Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 11:14 AM To: Subject: Re: LF: OP32 > Thanks to the receiving stations for the reports. > > Somehow i remember much better reports in september, odd... > > 73 all > > Stefan > > Am 24.10.2012 00:32, schrieb Graham: >> Good start ! >> >> 22:28 136 DK7FC de UA0SNV-1 Op32 3566 mi -36 dB in Ust-Ilimsk >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "Stefan Schäfer" >> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 11:10 PM >> To: >> Subject: LF: OP32 >> >>> LF, >>> >>> Decided to run some OP32 on 137.515 kHz tonite. In case someone want >>> to try in T/A distances? Maybe i can leave a last decode at UA0SNV >>> before his sunrise... >>> >>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >>> >