Return-Path: Received: (qmail 44884 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2004 21:59:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan03.plus.net) (212.159.14.237) by ptb-mailstore03.plus.net with SMTP; 11 Jun 2004 21:59:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 50803 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2004 21:59:08 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore03.plus.net (212.159.14.217) by ptb-mxscan03.plus.net with SMTP; 11 Jun 2004 21:59:07 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BYu3H-000Cz1-2U for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 22:59:07 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BYu2r-0002L4-EA for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 22:58:41 +0100 Received: from [213.232.95.59] (helo=relay.salmark.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BYu2q-0002Kv-Vt for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 22:58:41 +0100 Received: from cmsrelay02.mx.net ([165.212.11.111]) by relay.salmark.net with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BZ0bM-0001fU-92 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 05:58:44 +0100 Received: from uadvg129.cms.usa.net (165.212.11.129) by cmsoutbound.mx.net with SMTP; 11 Jun 2004 21:58:25 -0000 Received: from usa.net [151.41.154.254] by uadvg129.cms.usa.net (ASMTP/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.13N) with ESMTP id 033iFkV7V0140M29; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:58:21 GMT X-USANET-Auth: 151.41.154.254 AUTH dibene@usa.net usa.net Message-ID: <40CA2B19.8040507@usa.net> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:58:49 +0200 From: Alberto di Bene User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,FAKE_HELO_USA_NET=2.8 Subject: LF: Re: "Revolutionary antenna technology reduces size dramatically" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=FAKE_HELO_USA_NET autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 1 Alexander S. Yurkov wrote: >It seems funy EH-"antenna" realy works. But surface curent of a coax >realy radiate, not "antenna" itself :-) Certanly it is not better then >siple pice of wire :-) > > That's why the PVS proponents firmly refuse to carry scientifically controlled experiments with a zero-length feed line... Read the x-field yahoo group for details. >All "theorys" about "crossed fields" is a nonsence of cose... > > Yes, I forgot to mention Poynting as another "grave-spinner".... :-) 73 Alberto I2PHD