Message-ID: <404DE2F7.5070601@usa.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 16:29:59 +0100
From: Alberto di Bene <dibene@usa.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <7D653C9C42F5D411A27C00508BF8803D01A9F48C@mail.dstl.gov.uk> <000c01c405d7$9a522a00$2e2965d5@oemcomputer>
In-Reply-To: <000c01c405d7$9a522a00$2e2965d5@oemcomputer>
Subject: LF: RE: Ionospheric doppler ?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Thanks all for your comments.

The clock has an analog part, the receiver, with a very small ferrite
antenna, and a large black wax blob on the PCB, with many traces
reaching it. Usually this is the low cost "packaging" of an IC, which
probably is a sort of simplified microcontroller.

But it turned out that Andy and Johan were right.  I did what I should
have done since the beginning, and what I usually do when building
an oscillator to test its stability : the "blow test".

I blowed for 20 seconds on the exposed components of the clock,
and the result was a change of more than one microsecond....
so the 1pps signal is not derived directly from each pulse of DCF-77,
but from the internal oscillator, corrected every now and then with
the received signal...

I think I can use it as a high sensitivity thermometer, to measure
fractional degree changes in the temperature of my shack  :-)

73  Alberto  I2PHD