Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w2UIGrF6005304 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 20:16:56 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1f1yVs-0002hh-MB for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 19:12:32 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1f1yVr-0002hY-8o for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 19:12:31 +0100 Received: from smtp-out-5.talktalk.net ([62.24.135.69]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f1yVo-0002Ew-D4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 19:12:30 +0100 Received: from mal ([2.98.123.32]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP id 1yVnfVHPYlWlT1yVnfDU7D; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 19:12:27 +0100 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=talktalk.net Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=talktalk.net; s=cmr1711; t=1522433547; bh=FzuuoPLcPi9A+nXNEck+HGO2qP6rzDvBZ39bPf4UabQ=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=PNIYMhGQi/aIfDewq+0n7igY/pkJZaj+M9uXpyO/97NUyIv3qGEBvtkTc54qcf1sa FBoi5zHm3v3tfAGDrE+3w5+BmFFFa4KQg5EuqxHjtf8vhqMV5nYYUdSoJHwYt3FuME bQ6L2c1YgaPboPCjIGREBBc3HudDILdDOZhHu0BA= X-Originating-IP: [2.98.123.32] X-Spam: 0 X-OAuthority: v=2.3 cv=N4gH6V1B c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=9PtPHmF0HonoBFA3cgHD+A==:117 a=9PtPHmF0HonoBFA3cgHD+A==:17 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=F3M5lZpKAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=nN7BH9HXAAAA:8 a=PzJqOeAiqxUUQnpoMWYA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=VAcc9vEb1-qOTwYkjUoA:9 a=_gXTiy5sIAYMn7-9:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=slCku8JSH3TyizEDQ3pD:22 Message-ID: <403E2F1E4C1A422BB11CB7647EAD2949@mal> From: To: References: <5160a919-ec1f-92d4-24d2-4af64b822b1a@n1bug.com> <6E217E2953924C5E8D36633F1C1ABE35@mal> <3f16589d49f2c34bfcf533d6628e3dd2@smtp.hushmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3f16589d49f2c34bfcf533d6628e3dd2@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 19:12:26 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfIoL/9loerrXqjwxEobbPJIoxxV9IVUdfwjvkM/YZ/znLDDe9nH1lCs1RqVX3Lno8OufzNiocI9MPR30Iq/TRZJ/kijfJUw1LiOgxpj/b+Vs0AQonZU7 xmqvZG1jIOvFlGmpnC8j4/ksfPZYFmmuh5rkwQurqRygthCd2dOfeYgH X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: It might be old news but does not alter the conditions that applied at the time. The USA licence discussion is also old news. g3kev From: Tony Baldwin Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 5:22 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: CORRECTION regarding 2E0ILY-N1BUG QSO [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: cbf9d9751ac5f32708197d03fa6d8d74 Subject: LF: Re: CORRECTION regarding 2E0ILY-N1BUG QSO Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0078_01D3C85B.0A136A20" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0078_01D3C85B.0A136A20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It might be old news but does not alter the conditions that applied at = the time. The USA licence discussion is also old news.=20 g3kev From: Tony Baldwin=20 Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 5:22 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: Re: CORRECTION regarding 2E0ILY-N1BUG QSO This is old news anyway, as Ireland's ComReg changed the licence a few = years ago from "experimenters" to "amateur radio" Almost in step with the rest of the world ;-) Tony, EI8JK. On 30/03/2018 16:47, Roger Lapthorn wrote: Quote: "The Experimenters Radio Licence allows the licensee to participate in = what is predominately a hobby, but can be a service also, providing = communications for emergencies and disasters when needed. The licensed = Experimenter can use their radio equipment to communicate with, for = example, another licensed Experimenter in the same town, in the same = county or indeed with another Amateur operating from another continent." Mal, sounds like you are OK in Eire :-) 73s Roger G3XBM=20 On 30 March 2018 at 15:12, John Rabson = wrote: If I recall correctly, licences for the Irish Experimenters Service = were issued under the ITU regulations applicable to the Amateur Service. = John F5VLF On 30 Mar 2018, at 12:42, = wrote: Paul You refer to Amateur to Amateur QSO in your postings. My EI2AE = licence is a Radio Experimenters Licence and NOT a Radio Amateur = Licence, maybe i should not be having QSO=E2=80=99S with Radio Amateurs. = One has to be flexible and use some imagination when it comes to = Radio Experimenters and Radio Amateur Licences, and variations of such = Licences=20 de mal/g3kev ------=_NextPart_000_0078_01D3C85B.0A136A20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It might be old news but does not alter the conditions that applied = at the=20 time. The USA licence discussion is also old news.
g3kev
 
 
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 5:22 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org =
Subject: Re: LF: Re: CORRECTION regarding 2E0ILY-N1BUG=20 QSO
 
This=20 is old news anyway, as Ireland's ComReg changed the licence a few years = ago from=20 "experimenters" to "amateur radio"
Almost in step with the rest of = the world=20 ;-)
Tony, EI8JK.

On 30/03/2018 16:47, Roger Lapthorn = wrote:
Quote:
 
"The Experimenters Radio Licence allows the licensee to = participate in=20 what is predominately a hobby, but can be a service also, providing=20 communications for emergencies and disasters when needed. The licensed = Experimenter can use their radio equipment to communicate with, for = example,=20 another licensed Experimenter in the same town, in the same county or = indeed=20 with another Amateur operating from another continent."

Mal, sounds like you are OK in Eire  :-)
 
73s
Roger G3XBM
 
On 30 March 2018 at 15:12, John Rabson <john.rabson07@gmail.com> = wrote:
If I recall correctly, licences = for the=20 Irish Experimenters Service were issued under the ITU regulations = applicable=20 to the Amateur Service.=20
 
John F5VLF

On 30 Mar 2018, at 12:42, <g3kevmal@talktalk.net> <g3kevmal@talktalk.net> = wrote:
 
Paul
You refer to Amateur to Amateur QSO in your postings. My = EI2AE=20 licence is a Radio Experimenters Licence and NOT a Radio Amateur = Licence,=20 maybe i should not be having QSO=E2=80=99S with Radio Amateurs. =
One has to be flexible and use some imagination when it comes = to=20 Radio Experimenters and Radio Amateur Licences, and variations of = such=20 Licences
de mal/g3kev
 
 
=
 

------=_NextPart_000_0078_01D3C85B.0A136A20--