X-GM-THRID: 1232221858640183843
X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf
Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com
Received: by 10.115.73.6 with SMTP id a6cs321885wal;
        Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.67.98.9 with SMTP id a9mr1610141ugm.1175193072419;
        Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e34si2343507ugd.2007.03.29.11.31.09;
        Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
DomainKey-Status: good (test mode)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1HWzJa-0003Qh-Se
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:25:38 +0100
Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1HWzJa-0003QY-Ch
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:25:38 +0100
Received: from web25412.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.176.230])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <g3ykb@yahoo.co.uk>)
	id 1HWzJa-0006mb-1t
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:25:38 +0100
Received: (qmail 75152 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Mar 2007 18:25:32 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID;
  b=S2fa2qtcZuzyukaelSR8+JvZjy8GKN6AXtgtCZJCJm7tdWLCM3RBAKDuJDV1CuqjinTp1hprd6Q3Wky7v2cooojlTyOKdRBmcMOyN71Mdzp4Y9P2QishFXK+DJ/d9Y0A8cyoEH4l+F+8s6VpzuRquMpMvuw3u9VjPppnKXu1mgY=;
X-YMail-OSG: Q.5dWlwVM1lncw4dUPTROOD37BMRO_Pbbga050rr7kVwXcA2dcfDhMGEgplN4yFrYg--
Received: from [213.78.182.231] by web25412.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:25:31 BST
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:25:31 +0100 (BST)
From: brian hodgson <g3ykb@yahoo.co.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
In-Reply-To: <460B4585.7070504@telus.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <400989.73836.qm@web25412.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
Subject: Re: LF: Why 34nb20 blocking cap?
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1609227511-1175192731=:73836"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,
	MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 3992

--0-1609227511-1175192731=:73836
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi Guys - I also like to use the blocking capacitor circuit. I've had a few FETs go gate-drain short (probably from drain voltage spikes) - without the capacitor the driver chip gets the full HT voltage.  - Brian (G3YKB)

Scott Tilley <sthed475@telus.net> wrote:
  J.

This is to ensure DC doesn't drive the FETs and blow them up in the 
event that for some reason the exciter stops and the driver provides a 
constant DC signal to the FETs gate. This clamping type arrangement is 
to ensure only + going pulses drive the FETS and this is a critical FET 
safety feature. I have seen designs without it but I'm sure the users 
must have a box of spare FETs handy and a warm soldering iron...

Jump into your way back machine and do a circuit analyst of it and 
you'll see what I mean. The cap AC couples the drive, the diode ensures 
that it is clamped as a + DC pulse train... Therefore, a constant DC 
bias on the gate can't happen...

G0MRF was the first I noticed using this technique in amateur design of 
2200m class D amps.

73 Scott

PS - check your diode polarity!!!


J. Allen wrote:
> Hello Tech types.
>
> While I am working on the amp, I noticed that some of the FET drive 
> circuits are fed directly from a driver device (G3YXM circuit p66 LF 
> Today) and some use a blocking capacitor followed by a diode (G0MRF 
> circuit, p72).
>
> Why are the capacitors and diodes required in one FET circuit and not 
> in the other?
>
> Thanks,
>
> J.
>
>



 		
---------------------------------
 All New Yahoo! Mail ďż˝ Tired of unwanted email come-ons? Let our SpamGuard protect you.
--0-1609227511-1175192731=:73836
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<div>Hi Guys - I also like to use the blocking capacitor circuit. I've had a few FETs go gate-drain short (probably from drain voltage spikes) - without the capacitor the driver chip gets the full HT voltage.&nbsp; - Brian (G3YKB)<BR><BR><B><I>Scott Tilley &lt;sthed475@telus.net&gt;</I></B> wrote:</div>  <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">J.<BR><BR>This is to ensure DC doesn't drive the FETs and blow them up in the <BR>event that for some reason the exciter stops and the driver provides a <BR>constant DC signal to the FETs gate. This clamping type arrangement is <BR>to ensure only + going pulses drive the FETS and this is a critical FET <BR>safety feature. I have seen designs without it but I'm sure the users <BR>must have a box of spare FETs handy and a warm soldering iron...<BR><BR>Jump into your way back machine and do a circuit analyst of it and <BR>you'll see what I mean. The cap AC couples the drive,
 the diode ensures <BR>that it is clamped as a + DC pulse train... Therefore, a constant DC <BR>bias on the gate can't happen...<BR><BR>G0MRF was the first I noticed using this technique in amateur design of <BR>2200m class D amps.<BR><BR>73 Scott<BR><BR>PS - check your diode polarity!!!<BR><BR><BR>J. Allen wrote:<BR>&gt; Hello Tech types.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; While I am working on the amp, I noticed that some of the FET drive <BR>&gt; circuits are fed directly from a driver device (G3YXM circuit p66 LF <BR>&gt; Today) and some use a blocking capacitor followed by a diode (G0MRF <BR>&gt; circuit, p72).<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; Why are the capacitors and diodes required in one FET circuit and not <BR>&gt; in the other?<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; Thanks,<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; J.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><p>&#32;
		<hr size=1> 
<a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/uk/taglines/default/nowyoucan/spamguard/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=40565/*http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html">All New Yahoo! Mail</a> ďż˝ Tired of unwanted email come-ons? Let our SpamGuard protect you.
--0-1609227511-1175192731=:73836--