Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16837 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2000 09:05:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by grants.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 4 Jun 2000 09:05:40 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12yWHb-0002A5-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2000 10:01:23 +0100 Received: from fm215.facility.pipex.com ([194.131.104.225]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12yWHa-0002A0-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2000 10:01:22 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from isis (userb514.uk.uudial.com [193.149.82.243]) by fm215.facility.pipex.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA22190 for ; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 10:00:08 +0100 (BST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.20000604080903.00971dc0@mail.pncl.co.uk> X-Sender: blanch@mail.pncl.co.uk X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2000 10:01:28 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Walter Blanchard" Subject: Re: LF: GPS Frequency reference. In-reply-to: <4a.63e9364.266ae4ba@aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: David, Your query: >I've been looking for a high stability source to act as a timebase for a >frequency counter and for a PLL reference. > >I notice that the older Magellan GPS300 is available at $ 99. > >Does anyone know if: > >1) The GPS300 has a 1Hz pulse output. (Or any other sensible frequency with >high accuracy) > >2) It can display Maidenhead locators. I haven't been following this thread so not sure what you actually want these for, but a word of warning. These cheapo GPS's either (a) will not have any outputs, or (b) timing-wise they won't be worth a damn if you want any real accuracy. They use the cheapest VXO they can and depend on the software to hold time so it's very jittery. Are you looking for accurate relative time or accurate absolute time? - there's a big difference. Why don't you use MSF? It's very easy to filter out the 60 kHz carrier and divide down to whatever you want - even I can do it! And it's based on one of the frequency standards that USNO uses for GPS. You could always buy an MSF clock module from Maplin for a few quid and dig into it to pull out what you want. Have a word with Dr John Laverty at NPL - he supplies the controlling timing reference for MSF and is happy to talk to anyone about time and timing references. Walter G3JKV. Walter G3JKV.