Return-Path: Received: from mtain-de04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-de04.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.204]) by air-di01.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDI013-eab84b954fae1a0; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:27:42 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-de04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 263EF380000A8; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 14:27:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Noiao-0001RC-D0 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:26:18 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Noian-0001R3-Vg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:26:17 +0000 Received: from mailfilter21.ihug.co.nz ([203.109.136.21]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Noiak-0004yJ-5r for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:26:17 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AowHAFLelEvLbdY5/2dsb2JhbACHVJNcdLplhHgEiws X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,603,1262516400"; d="scan'208";a="53057498" Received: from 203-109-214-57.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz (HELO athlon1200) ([203.109.214.57]) by cust.filter3.content.vf.net.nz with SMTP; 09 Mar 2010 08:26:07 +1300 Message-ID: <3aba01cabef5$25589df0$7900a8c0@athlon1200> From: "Dave Brown" To: References: Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 08:25:39 +1300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: VLF Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40cc4b954fab5a63 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Also been considering the ground loop option but for 136kHz- I can't= =20 recall any reference to this being tried anywhere by the amateur=20 fraternity. If it has been tried, what were the results? Another option for VLF might be along the lines of this-- ELF, VLF and LF radiation from a very large loop antenna with a=20 mountain core Barr, R.; Ireland, W.; Smith, M. J. IEE Proceedings, Part H - Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation (ISSN= =20 0950-107X), vol. 140, no. 2, p. 129-134. The establishment of an LF/VLF/ELF transmitting facility at the Homer= =20 tunnel near Milford South in the South Island of New Zealand is=20 described. The antenna consisted of a 3.3 km-long PVC-covered aluminum= =20 conductor passing through the tunnel and over the mountain above,=20 forming a large vertical loop antenna. Measurements of the electric=20 field radiated from the transmitter, recorded at both Lauder and=20 Palmerston, 133 and 225 km from the transmitter site, respectively,=20 are presented. The antenna radiation pattern derived from observations= =20 made onboard an Orion aircraft circling the antenna at a distance of= =20 200 km is also presented. Theoretical models are derived which enable= =20 fits to the radiated field data to be made over a wide frequency range= =20 (0.5-40 kHz). With 1 kW of input power the antenna produced peak=20 radiated fields at frequencies near 10 kHz equivalent to those of a=20 vertical monopole source radiating 150 mW. Finding a convenient hill and tunnel might be a challenge though! 73 Dave, ZL3FJ ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Andy Talbot" To: Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 7:42 AM Subject: LF: VLF ...wishing I'd persued the NoV application a few years ago instead of= =20 just letting it slide into oblivion... Has anyone yet tried a ground loop at 9kHz? That was going to be my= =20 first (and probably only) antenna type, running a length of wire as far away= =20 from the house as I could get-away with and connecting it to a ground=20 stake, then feeding this against the existing local earth. I never got round to= =20 making measurements to see what sort of ground resistance might be expected, but that would have been a lot easier than winding 1.4H air= =20 wound chokes. My house backs onto a main road, and there is a drainage ditch running behide trees and foliage running for about 70m in one direction that= =20 would have made a useful route to hide a wire in. Might have been=20 interesting hammering in a ground stake next to the footpath at the corner of the next road though ! Andy www.g4jnt.com 2010/3/8 Wolfgang B=FCscher > Hi Stefan, > > > A VLF grabber would be very fine! If you can arrange that, it would= =20 > perhaps >> be a motivation for the dreamers ;-) >> >> > Well there are two now (Markus' and Paul's) .. I will try to add a= =20 > third > but need to get away from the local QRM. The plan is to use an UHF= =20 > FM link > to the remote, battery-powered site but there are some issues to be= =20 > solved - > one of them is the lack of dynamic range of the FM=20 > transmitter/receiver, so > I may have to add some analog bandpass filtering before the FM=20 > modulator > (which would render it useless for broadband VLF signals, especially= =20 > natural > radio signals..). > > Will keep you informed, when/where another VLF 'live spectrogram'=20 > goes > online. > > Cheers, > Wolf . > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------= ---------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.435 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2730 - Release Date:=20 03/08/10 07:34:00