Return-Path: Received: (qmail 42015 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2003 18:05:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan03.plus.net) (212.159.14.237) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 24 Dec 2003 18:05:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 62002 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2003 18:05:31 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from ptb-mxcore03.plus.net (212.159.14.217) by ptb-mxscan03.plus.net with SMTP; 24 Dec 2003 18:05:31 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1AZDNy-000G18-Vq for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 18:05:31 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1AZDNE-0008If-DU for rs_out@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 18:04:44 +0000 Received: from [144.254.74.5] (helo=ams-iport-1.cisco.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1AZDND-0008Ed-K4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 18:04:43 +0000 Received: from virgin.net (144.254.74.60) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Dec 2003 19:05:07 +0100 Received: from cisco.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ams-msg-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id hBOI3uY3015524 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 19:03:56 +0100 (MET) Received: from virgin.net (ams-clip-vpn-dhcp213.cisco.com [10.61.64.213]) by cisco.com (8.8.8/2.6/Cisco List Logging/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA06657 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 18:04:12 GMT Message-ID: <3FE9D51B.3030204@virgin.net> Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 18:04:11 +0000 From: "Stewart Bryant" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <3FE9A698.9025.1D0CEC4@localhost> <3FE9C418.8070300@virgin.net> In-reply-to: <3FE9C418.8070300@virgin.net> Subject: Re: LF: sub664.pdf (application/pdf Object) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 1 Stewart Bryant wrote: > >>> http://www.iee.org/Policy/Submissions/current.cfm >>> >>> My view is that trading is as great a threat to the >>> upper spectrum, as PLT is to the lower, and needs to >>> be defended with the same vigor as is being applied >>> to the PLT defense. >> >> >> >> Except that the supplied link for more details on the Ofcom site >> doesn't work, presumably Ofcom is still in a time of move. > > > Yes, but IEE feedback needs to be in by 23rd Jan. > > Stewart > > > The documant is here: http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/current/spectrum_trading/?a=87101