Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3748 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2003 08:22:57 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by netmail00.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 12 Sep 2003 08:22:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 1494 invoked by uid 10001); 12 Sep 2003 08:22:55 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 12 Sep 2003 08:21:17 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19xjAM-00032G-0s for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:20:30 +0100 Received: from [144.254.74.5] (helo=ams-iport-1.cisco.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19xjAI-00031v-0y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:20:26 +0100 Received: from virgin.net (144.254.74.60) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Sep 2003 10:18:46 +0200 Received: from cisco.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ams-msg-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h8C8HWxN015717 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:17:32 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from virgin.net (ams-clip-vpn-dhcp126.cisco.com [10.61.64.126]) by cisco.com (8.8.8/2.6/Cisco List Logging/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA26358 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:19:53 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <3F6181A9.30807@virgin.net> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:19:53 +0100 From: "Stewart Bryant" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Inverted tube amplifier Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0tests=USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,X_ACCEPT_LANGversion=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Rating: 1 I came across an interesting concept yesterday that I thought worthy of further consideration for an LF active antenna. The so called inverted vacuum tube amplifier. Consider a triode, with a positive grid and a negative anode, with the input signal going to the anode, and the output taken from the grid. This has a high input impeadance, very low input capacitance, and low output impeadance. It also is more linear than a conventional valve amplifier. These are exactly the characteristics that are needed in an active antenna. The downside is that although it has a power gain due to the impeadance transformation, it has a massive voltage loss, because in this mode the valve mu becomes 1/mu. At low frequencies the issue with voltage probe active antennas is not so much the voltage at the probe, but the very high capacitive potential divider that results from the very low capacitance of the probe, and the input capacitance of the active device and its infrastructure. The key test therefore is whether the voltage attenuation of the value in this mode is less than the voltage "gain" that results from the lower input capacitance term in the input potential divider. Because of it's improvements in linearity, this mode is of interest to the audio groups, particularly those interested in transformerless valve amplifiers. There is a writeup of the technique at http://members.aol.com/sbench102/inverted.html The inventor of the technique was none other than Fred Terman, who wrote it up for proc IRE F Terman, The inverted vacuum tube, a voltage reducing power amplifier. Proc. Inst. Rad. Eng. 16:447-61. (1928) In case anyone thinks that this is a misplaced April Fools Joke, there ia also a reference to the paper in his book Radio Enginneering, although neither of the editions that I have give any useful theory on the operation. If anyone has access to a copy of that paper, I would appreciate a copy, otherwise I will try to get one the next time I am in the IEE library in London. Stewart G3YSX