Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3260 invoked from network); 19 May 2003 16:15:31 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 19 May 2003 16:15:31 -0000 X-Priority: 3 Received: (qmail 13147 invoked by uid 10001); 19 May 2003 16:08:50 -0000 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 19 May 2003 16:08:50 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19HnBE-0002Rl-J7 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 May 2003 17:08:04 +0100 Received: from [171.71.177.238] (helo=sj-core-5.cisco.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19HnB9-0002RY-Uu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 May 2003 17:08:00 +0100 Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.71.48]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h4JG78BP016825 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 09:07:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from virgin.net (ams-clip-vpn-dhcp36.cisco.com [10.61.64.36]) by cisco.com (8.8.8/2.6/Cisco List Logging/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA01994 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 17:07:04 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <3EC90127.90804@virgin.net> Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 17:07:03 +0100 From: "Stewart Bryant" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <3EC3A9F2.90104@verizon.net> Subject: Re: LF: No LF Band in US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.6 required=5.0tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UAversion=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false > The FCC said a new amateur LF allocation is not justified ''when > balanced against the greater public interest of an interference-free > power grid.'' The FCC said amateurs wishing to experiment with LF > could apply for experimental licenses or operate under existing Part > 15 rules on that part of the spectrum. ''We will not jeopardize the > reliability of electrical service to the public,'' the FCC > concluded. Are there experimental liciences of the UK type that extends the individual amateur's privilages on a case by case basis, or are they just for working amongst the experimental group? Stewart G3YSX