Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19546 invoked from network); 14 May 2003 10:17:47 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 14 May 2003 10:17:47 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 18459 invoked by uid 10001); 14 May 2003 10:17:47 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 14 May 2003 10:17:47 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19FtJj-0000ea-Mo for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 May 2003 11:16:59 +0100 Received: from [24.153.64.115] (helo=smtp-out.comcast.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19FtJe-0000dm-SG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 May 2003 11:16:55 +0100 Received: from snet.net (12-209-21-79.client.attbi.com [12.209.21.79]) by mtaout02.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HEV005VNGICER@mtaout02.icomcast.net> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 May 2003 06:15:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 06:20:05 -0400 From: "Jay Rusgrove" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <3EC21855.D16E9AA3@snet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en References: <000701c319fb$49707ba0$6507a8c0@Main> Subject: Re: LF: CFH agn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-22.8 required=5.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTESversion=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Alan I can't tell you about last night but it appears to be full strength this morning... Jay Rusgrove, W1VD Alan Melia wrote: > Hi all despite a definite "switch-off" at about 2400z on the 12th, I was > sure I saw a weak FSK trace on ARGO at about 2320z last night (13th) My > logger was started but the plot is wery weak. The line definitely seems to > be above the noise, but at such low levels I cannot be sure that I was not > measuring something else. > > Can any of the N.American stations confirm activity of CFH last night?? If > this is confirmed, this is by far the lowest signal level received, and > there is no history of them ever running a QRP mode. > > Thanks and Cheers de Alan G3NYK > alan.melia@btinternet.com