Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27837 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2003 10:36:37 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 28 Apr 2003 10:36:37 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 18053 invoked by uid 10001); 28 Apr 2003 10:36:36 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 28 Apr 2003 10:36:36 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19A5yM-0006Da-0L for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 11:34:58 +0100 Received: from [24.153.64.115] (helo=smtp-out.comcast.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19A5yG-0006DA-TS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 11:34:53 +0100 Received: from snet.net (12-209-21-79.client.attbi.com [12.209.21.79]) by mtaout02.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HE1008LFUK8N0@mtaout02.icomcast.net> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 06:31:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 06:35:02 -0400 From: "Jay Rusgrove" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <3EAD03D6.36541070@snet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en References: <2D280BB697C7EE4C979C5C89925418EFB05C1F@TNS-FBU-2E-003.corp.telenor.no> Subject: Re: LF: RE: RE: Re: RX-LOOP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-22.8 required=5.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTESversion=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Jan-Martin Have you found that it makes any difference where the core is placed along the transmission line? Jay Rusgrove, W1VD jan-martin.noding@telenor.com wrote: > Right, > > but you may also use a balun. See RSGB book about EMC (or TVI ...suppose mine is quite old..) and wind the coax cable 10 or more turns through a ferrite core with sufficiently high permeability. > > I use it for my active antenna, and it is of course mounted some distance above the roof. Since you don't need RG8/U type cable for LF it shouldn't be a problem to manage 10-20 turns through the toroid (provided you haven't installed the BNC connectors in the ends) > > 73, Jan-Martin, LA8AK > > http://home.online.no/~la8ak/ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ashlock,William [mailto:William.Ashlock@bocedwards.com] > > Alan, all: > > >I suspect that you need to isolate the loop feed with a small transformer. > It is possible that > >the feed from the loop is acting as a wire aerial and is conducting TV RFI > and noises from the > >house *back to the loop*. > > Surprising how few understand the concept of the RFI actually going from the > receiver back to the antenna site. This applies to E-probe antennas as well. > The typical house/apartment is a mad jumble of LF RFI having both E and H > field components. The proper RF return for remote LF antennas is the ground > immediately under the antenna - not the safety (green wire) ground in the > shack that connects to the chassis of the receiver. The isolation > transformer installed in the coax lead-in offers the only way to sever these > totally different grounds. In severe cases one is needed both at the > receiver and at the antenna since a floating coax shield can pick up noise > before it leaves the vicinity of the shack. > > BTW, an isolation transformed can be as simple as two 15-turn windings of > #22 to #28 wire on a common 3/4"dia X 1" ferrite RFI bead found on computer > power cords, monitor cables, communications cables, etc. > > Bill A > > _____________________________________________________________________ > This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by the WorldCom Internet Managed Scanning Service - powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit http://www.worldcom.com