Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19148 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2003 07:45:15 -0000 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 26 Apr 2003 07:45:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 25036 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2003 07:45:08 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 26 Apr 2003 07:45:08 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 199KMO-0001Tn-Bs for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 08:44:36 +0100 Received: from [171.71.177.254] (helo=sj-core-2.cisco.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 199KMJ-0001Te-EW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 08:44:31 +0100 Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.71.48]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h3Q7hvID000948 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 00:43:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from virgin.net (ams-clip-vpn-dhcp45.cisco.com [10.61.64.45]) by cisco.com (8.8.8/2.6/Cisco List Logging/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA09936 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 08:43:56 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <3EAA3857.5020400@virgin.net> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 08:42:15 +0100 From: "Stewart Bryant" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1e5.78b8a15.2bdab2b2@aol.com> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by sj-core-2.cisco.com id h3Q7hvID000948 Subject: Re: LF: RE: something for the weekend ?? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-28.6 required=5.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UAversion=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false I am not sure about the physics of this. The 90deg phase shifter has to be some sort of dispersion device (propagation time varies with frequency), and this will operate on the fourier components of the waveform. The fourier components present are sin(a+b) and sin(a-b), not the complex waveform cos(a)*sin(b). Therefore the phaseshift will apply individually to sin(a+b) and to sin(a-b). Can we go back to the physical device itself, and confirm that the IF phase shifter is shifting by 90deg (as opposed to say 270deg) and that you can select both sidebands properly with the add/subtract? Stewart G3YSX DL4YHF@aol.com wrote: > Think I got it... > > The output from the upper mixer branch is: > sin(a+b) - sin(a-b) > > The assumption "delayed this by 90 degrees" should give > cos(a+b) - cos(a-b) > does not look right in my opinion. > > > Instead, do the "90° phase shift" from the upper mixer's output in the > term where all trigonometric functions have only a single argument. > Upper mixer branch > sin(a+b)-sin(a-b) = 2*cos(a)*sin(b) [ go figure ...] > Now only one argument in each trig function, looks safe to do the 90 > degree phase shift by adding 90 degrees in the argumens: > Upper mixer branch, delayed by 90°: > 2*cos(a+90°)*sin(b+90°) = - 2*sin(a)*cos(b) = - sin(a-b) - sin(a+b) > > So this is the delayed output from the upper mixer branch. Now add upper > and lower branch (without the phase shifters): > Lower branch : sin(a+b)-sin(a-b) > Upper branch : -sin(a+b)-sin(a+b) > Add both: sin(a+b)-sin(a-b)-sin(a-b)-sin(a+b) = -2sin(a-b) > Et volia, the upper sideband has been cancelled (should have subtracted > for USB ;) > > > Hope this is not totally wrong.. > > Regards, > Wolf DL4YHF.