Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23886 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2003 13:14:58 -0000 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 27 Mar 2003 13:14:58 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 5241 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2003 13:14:59 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 27 Mar 2003 13:14:59 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 18yXCn-0005db-P3 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:14:05 +0000 Received: from [204.60.203.69] (helo=mta3.snet.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 18yXCZ-0005dS-DS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:13:51 +0000 Received: from snet.net (222.220.252.64.snet.net [64.252.220.222]) by mta3.snet.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/SNET-smtp-1.2/D-1.1.1.1/O-1.1.1.1) with ESMTP id h2RDDmQV017591 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 08:13:49 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E82F966.EBA8C314@snet.net> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 08:15:18 -0500 From: "Jay Rusgrove" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <3E82EDA6.A2A04CC2@snet.net> Subject: Re: [Fwd: LF: POUR LES FRANCOPHONES] Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=5.0tests=FWD_MSG,HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, QUOTE_TWICE_1,REFERENCESversion=2.51 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.51 (1.174.2.5-2003-03-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Rik

Thanks for setting me straight on that.

Actually, that posting got mixed in with e mails for the company and got the usual response before noting that it was an rsgb reflector posting. I didn't intend to speak for anyone else.

>Sorry we don't speak French.
Hello Ray,
shouldn't that be "Sorry I don't speak French" ?

Yes, that would be better, but, let me go one step further...

"Sorry, I won't speak French!" ;~)

Jay Rusgrove, W1VD

A large number of "we" is not native English and I am sure that a lot of
them (and maybe also of the native English) do speak and read other
languages, such as French ...
73, Rik ON7YD
>f1tay wrote:
>>Bonjour,Je viens de découvrir qu'il existe un groupe de discussion
>>francophone sur la bande 137 kHz.C'est sur yahoo france c'est le groupe
>>137khz-fr.73 de Daniel