Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18002 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2003 23:13:57 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 24 Mar 2003 23:13:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 12311 invoked by uid 10001); 24 Mar 2003 23:13:57 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 24 Mar 2003 23:13:57 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 18xb89-0004bE-Oj for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 23:13:25 +0000 Received: from [165.212.11.2] (helo=cmsrelay05.mx.net) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 4.14) id 18xb80-0004at-HG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 23:13:16 +0000 Received: from uadvg131.cms.usa.net (HELO localhost) (165.212.11.131) by cmsoutbound.mx.net with SMTP; 24 Mar 2003 23:12:43 -0000 Received: from usa.net [213.255.83.139] by uadvg131.cms.usa.net (ASMTP/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.2.05) with ESMTP id 306HcXXmW0204M31; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 23:12:48 GMT Message-ID: <3E7F90FA.1000302@usa.net> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 00:12:58 +0100 From: "Alberto di Bene" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030324175015.0272cec0@pop.mindspring.com> Subject: Re: LF: Receiver Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.5 required=5.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UAversion=2.51 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.51 (1.174.2.5-2003-03-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Frank Gentges KØBRA wrote: > I have similar good experience with the NRD-525. My only comment is > that the display and microprocessor can generate some false signals > which are down near the noise threshold aurally but can show up more > in the narrowband displays like Argo and sound like brain dead CW. A > good active antenna will cover up those signals. My antenna is at more than 15 meters from the Rx, which is duly grounded in the station. I haven't noticed much noise from the digital part of the Rx, but frankly I haven't looked specifically for it. Now that you have raised the problem, will do some tests. In any case, the NRD-525 won't leave my shack, I like it too much ! I use it even for listening to music on MW broadcasts while working on the PC, as also the audio quality is good. 73 Alberto I2PHD