Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28193 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2003 22:40:58 -0000 Received: from netmail01.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.219) by mailstore with SMTP; 24 Mar 2003 22:40:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 17185 invoked by uid 10001); 24 Mar 2003 22:40:58 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail01.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 24 Mar 2003 22:40:58 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 18xac1-0004Ih-TD for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 22:40:13 +0000 Received: from [165.212.11.110] (helo=cmsrelay01.mx.net) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 4.14) id 18xabw-0004IT-Sl for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 22:40:09 +0000 Received: from uadvg131.cms.usa.net (HELO localhost) (165.212.11.131) by cmsoutbound.mx.net with SMTP; 24 Mar 2003 22:39:41 -0000 Received: from usa.net [213.255.83.139] by uadvg131.cms.usa.net (ASMTP/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.2.05) with ESMTP id 394HcXwnW0384M31; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 22:39:49 GMT Message-ID: <3E7F893F.3050506@usa.net> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 23:39:59 +0100 From: "Alberto di Bene" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: Subject: Re: LF: Receiver Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=5.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UAversion=2.51 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.51 (1.174.2.5-2003-03-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Steve Dove wrote: >Hi Alberto, > >The fuzziness that is my memory vaguely remembers you once saying that you were using >a JRC receiver, which you really liked. Is this so, and which model? > > Hi Steve, it is the JRC NRD-525, which is also quite stable, having a TCXO factory-installed. Also the sensitivity on the LF is very good, at a par with the TS-850 I had a couple of years ago. As some reviewers of digital cameras would say, ** recommended ** :-) 73 Alberto I2PHD