Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20260 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2003 13:54:20 -0000 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 20 Jan 2003 13:54:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 12813 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2003 13:54:18 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 20 Jan 2003 13:54:18 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.12) id 18acMl-0007TJ-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 13:53:31 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from [166.82.1.68] (helo=host3.ctc.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18acMl-0007TA-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 13:53:31 +0000 Received: from att.net ([166.82.181.250]) by host3.ctc.net (InterMail vK.4.03.05.03 201-232-132-103 license 2d687b22c655f23831a2faa19b737467) with ESMTP id <20030120135420.HVRQ17780.host3@att.net> for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 08:54:20 -0500 Message-ID: <3E2BFF56.5E28E640@att.net> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 13:53:26 +0000 From: "Dexter McIntyre W4DEX" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5.1.0.14.0.20030120111745.00b03438@gemini.herts.ac.uk> <001201c2c07c$06a43e20$0500a8c0@charter.net> Subject: Re: LF: Early morning tests? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=6.0tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_XM,X_ACCEPT_LANGversion=2.43 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Looks like my best capture of Laurie's and Jim's signal occurred around 0630. Comparing John's captures with mine it's obvious it takes a little better conditions or a little more power to get another 1130 km. The difference certainly can't be due to skill and equipment :) Best screen is: http://www.w4dex.com/argo/20jan03/0630.jpg All overnight captures with any trace of signal can be seen from the directory: http://www.w4dex.com/argo/20jan03/ Lloyd's 0730 capture from Maryland shows good copy of both signals while Laurie's signal has vanished here. Was still seeing some of Jim's signal though. Lloyds capture: http://www.geocities.com/lacwman/135jan20.jpg Dex John Andrews wrote: > > Jim's and Laurie's excellent morning signals may be seen in the "20Jan" > files at: > http://webpages.charter.net/w1tag/136/ > > "M0BMU" sure didn't fit on one screen! > > John Andrews, W1TAG