Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.142.105 with SMTP id rv9csp370147igb; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:45:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.48.8 with SMTP id h8mr12474738wjn.106.1403732726383; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:45:26 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id fu4si9045332wib.47.2014.06.25.14.45.25 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:45:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail (test mode) header.i=@btinternet.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WzuGz-0005oo-TK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:58:29 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WzuGz-0005oT-Im for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:58:29 +0100 Received: from rgout06.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.183]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WzuGx-0000lC-EH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:58:28 +0100 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090206.53AB37F3.0017,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=38/50,refid=2.7.2:2014.6.17.121219:17:38.936,ip=86.174.44.235,rules=__HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, MSGID_32HEX_LC, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __MSGID_32HEX, __HAS_FROM, __PHISH_FROM2, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_WWW, __URI_NO_PATH, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __LINES_OF_YELLING, __FORWARDED_MSG, BODY_SIZE_3000_3999, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, __URI_NS, SXL_IP_DYNAMIC[235.44.174.86.fur], HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, __PHISH_FROM, __OUTLOOK_MUA, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1, RDNS_SUSP, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from gnat (86.174.44.235) by rgout06.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.122.06) (authenticated as alan.melia@btinternet.com) id 5399A5DA00D3866F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:58:26 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1403729907; bh=Fel6mxkHxy4hIz8IUj2bEFSCIOL4fp+dG66J7FrF2jU=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer; b=ssRdMq8eEF2JQ8rt6aLzVsu1ebGHThMV2mjRqTV9JN1phqThncpmtAQGj5hl5L2W/7XpeRJicm32rRcnvlqFsc3wkaEWYopJbNgXLJrkVRDhyL3SePTWAZ31PYmwlALLmJ03Lbc8VFD6nE9aokz9/GffQWtCzQZNeRIaX13Ak5s= Message-ID: <3E2191D6995647D48932529876C7636C@gnat> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:55:11 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi both thanks for confirming the results from my DCF39 monitoring (via CT1DRP) over the years. I think it maybe the old story....yes its more uncomfortable to use ears in summer, but the data modes how the propagation is often still there but for a shorter darkness period. Also if no one is active, there seems to be no propagation :-)) [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.20.0.183 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 2ee80849a5d572dbc974bb207a527753 Subject: LF: Re: RE: Summer Solstice Test report Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi both thanks for confirming the results from my DCF39 monitoring (via CT1DRP) over the years. I think it maybe the old story....yes its more uncomfortable to use ears in summer, but the data modes how the propagation is often still there but for a shorter darkness period. Also if no one is active, there seems to be no propagation :-)) It is interesting that there does seem to be a suggestion that 137 holds up better in summer than 472.......have I read that correctly, or maybe it was from another poster. I was not able to do the same sort of tests for 472. Good work Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave G3WCB." To: ; Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 9:33 PM Subject: LF: RE: Summer Solstice Test report > Hi, Mike. > > It was an interesting experiment. I was getting similar night-time ranges > during the Solstice Test as I was getting during the winter. > LF activity is probably lower during the summer as all the lush vegetation > needs pruning, lawns need mowing and gardens digging, leaving less time > for > amateur radio! > > My LF WSPR beacon will stay on overnight, then QRT for a few days. Will > probably be back on WSPR-2/630m after that, unless any requests received > for > continued operation on 137 kHz. > > LF equipment is a QRSS Labs U2 driving an outboard PA. 200W RF out, 1.5A > antenna current into 20m long "tee" at 5m, surrounded by lush > vegetation... > > 73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Mike Dennison > Sent: 25 June 2014 19:15 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk > Subject: LF: Summer Solstice Test report > > > Propagation guru Alan, G3NYK, always argues that there is no such > thing as a DX season at LF from a propagation point of view. It is > true that in the summer we get more lightning static, the darkness > hours are less and the lush vegetation in our gardens absorbs more > RF, but is it still possible to work DX at 136kHz at mid-summer? This > was the idea behind an activity boost from 15 to 22 June. > > There was much beacon activity on OP32 and WSPR. DK7FC and I also > made a two-way QRSS3 daylight contact. It was interesting to see > better results between DL and G than on 472kHz during the day. DK7FC > also made the best DX, being reported by W1VD one night. > > The result, as observed by me, is shown in the statistics below. I am > sure that others can add to this. > > Transmitting stations: > DF6NM, DK7FC, G3WCB, G3XDV, G8HUH, PA0A, R7NT, SV8CS [8] > > Countries active on transmit: > DL, G, PA, R, SV [5] > > Countries active on receive: > DL, EA, EW, F, G, GW, PA, R, SP, SV, W, YO [12] > > Total stations active (including receive-only): > [24] > > Best DX by XDV transmitting: > EW6BN 1939km, YO/4X1RF 2097km, RX3DHR 2582km, (all OP32/OPDS) > > Best daylight DX by XDV transmitting: > SP5XSB 1444km @ 0710UTC > > Best DX received by XDV: > R7NT, 2835km (OP32, WSPR2, WSPR15) > > Best DX observed: > DK7FC > W1VD, 6099km (OP32/OPDS) > > Best time for DX (East): > 2100 - 0030UTC > > Best time for DX (West): > 0251UTC > > So once again Alan has been proved right. > > Thanks to all who participated, especially those who provided SWL > reports. > > 73 de Mike, G3XDV > =============== > >