Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16189 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2002 14:01:17 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 18 Nov 2002 14:01:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 9096 invoked by uid 10001); 18 Nov 2002 13:59:54 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 18 Nov 2002 13:59:54 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 18DmPz-0001s6-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:58:27 +0000 Received: from [195.170.0.5] (helo=mailsrv.otenet.gr) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18DmPz-0001rx-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:58:27 +0000 Received: from otenet.gr (myti530-a026.otenet.gr [212.205.251.154]) by mailsrv.otenet.gr (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gAIDw9qF025524 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:58:24 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <3DD8A702.FDAA16E2@otenet.gr> Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:38:26 +0200 From: "Alex Deligiannis" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en,el MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <3DD6356A.8070000@usa.net> <3DD7D1A3.20509@usa.net> Subject: Re: LF: Argo V1 build 130 released Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-7; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,DEAR_SOMEBODY,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02, USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_XM,X_ACCEPT_LANGversion=2.42 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Dear Alberto, V1.130 running here OK but I have a question about Spectran V1 which I use more than Argo. I found a difference of 110 to 120 mH between Argo readings and Spectran as follows: MSF > Argo 799.73 Hz Spectran 799.84 Hz HBG > Argo 799.71 Hz Spectran 799.84 Hz and DCF77 > Argo 799.71 Hz Spectran 799.84 Hz (all CW mode 800 HZ pitch) I'm wandering why I have this difference between the two programs and second how I can calibrate spectran. Thank you Alex SV8QG Alberto di Bene wrote: > Hi all > > I have just uploaded on the weaksignals site Version 1, build 130 > of Argo. From the readme file : > > V1, build 130 (Nov. 17th, 2002) > - NDB mode added > - Wave file read/write added > - Screen capture dialog rewritten (now should work as intended). > - Added the computation of the capture timing to specify for a screenfull. > - Corrected a few errors, one of which could cause random abnormal > terminations. > - Ported to V6 of the C++Builder compiler > > As usual, it is freely downloadable from : > http://www.weaksignals.com > > Please read the readme file for information on the new functions. > Comments and bug reports welcome. > > 73 Alberto I2PHD