Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1084 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2002 13:14:02 -0000 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 14 Sep 2002 13:14:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 26385 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2002 13:14:05 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 14 Sep 2002 13:14:05 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 17qCjO-0001Mp-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 14:13:02 +0100 Received: from [144.254.98.48] (helo=cisco.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17qCjO-0001MS-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 14:13:02 +0100 Received: from virgin.net (ams-clip-vpn-dhcp100.cisco.com [10.50.0.99]) by cisco.com (8.8.8/2.6/Cisco List Logging/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA12064 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 14:12:31 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <3D83358C.73D3AFA3@virgin.net> Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 14:11:40 +0100 From: "Stewart Bryant" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en]C-CCK-MCD (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000c01c25a7d$61588c00$1acefc3e@l8p8y6> Subject: Re: LF: LF/5 MHZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0tests=noneversion=2.31 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group > hamilton mal wrote: > > There seems to be a number of LF operators using the new 5 mhz band. Is there anyone in the USA reading this message that can > transmit on one of the 5 mhz freqs. I have listened a couple of times and so far heard nil from across the water. Please let me > know. I am on frequently using CW and SSB, but have most modes available. > The operating standard on CW and associated procedures is of a high standard on 5 mhz. > 73 de Mal/G3KEV > Although the NoV does not really say anything about who we can work (other than explicitly including military stations), the terms of reference on the RSGB web site prohibit cross-band working with non-NOV holders. It is therefore not clear that we are licienced to work US stations. Stewart G3YSX