Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23589 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2002 09:45:48 -0000 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 5 Aug 2002 09:45:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 24793 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2002 09:45:34 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 5 Aug 2002 09:45:34 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17bg66-0006F6-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2002 12:32:26 +0100 Received: from cmsrelay05.mx.net ([165.212.11.2] helo=cmsoutbound.mx.net) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17bg64-0006F1-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2002 12:32:25 +0100 Received: from uadvg131.cms.usa.net (HELO cmsoutbound.mx.net) (165.212.11.131) by cmsoutbound.mx.net with SMTP; 5 Aug 2002 09:40:35 -0000 Received: from usa.net [32.97.110.72] by uadvg131.cms.usa.net (ASMTP/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (CM.1201.1.04A) with ESMTP id 505gHeJpD0405M31; Mon, 05 Aug 2002 09:41:04 GMT Message-ID: <3D4E47CB.84D56248@usa.net> Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 11:39:23 +0200 From: "Alberto di Bene" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Cc: lowfer@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: LF: ARGO bug report... References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: WE0H wrote: > I found that v.128 beta could only capture at a maximum interval of 9999 > seconds. There will be a bit of overlap of capture windows at QRSS-90 and > even more at -120. I set it to 9999, which sure isn't many captures for an > overnighter, but will cover it all until 6am central when I shut it down. Mike, I put that arbitrary limit on the capture interval of Argo, thinking nobody would need a greater value. Apparently I was wrong... The next version (for which I have no dates at the moment) will have that limit relaxed, and the capability to record / playback standard WAV files. 73 Alberto I2PHD