Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19027 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2002 12:22:05 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 24 Jul 2002 12:22:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 22140 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2002 12:21:00 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 24 Jul 2002 12:21:00 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17XL5Z-00000w-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 13:17:57 +0100 Received: from d06lmsgate-5.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.5]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17XL5Y-00000r-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 13:17:56 +0100 Received: from d06relay01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.166.84.147]) by d06lmsgate-5.uk.ibm.com (1.0.0) with ESMTP id MAA74256; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 12:37:42 +0100 Received: from usa.net (ss9.bld.socks.ibm.com [9.14.4.75]) by d06relay01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO/VER6.2) with ESMTP id g6OBZlQ40000; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 12:35:48 +0100 Message-ID: <3D3E90C1.2542A90E@usa.net> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 13:34:25 +0200 From: "Alberto di Bene" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Cc: lowfer@mailman.qth.net, lf@amrad.org Subject: LF: Re: Jason V0.94 References: <20020723.212259.-691071.2.riese-k3djc@juno.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: BOB RIESE wrote: > Alberto > > The ability to record your sending and make a wave file is super > also allows the centering of the frequency and other adjustments > and allows a bit of familiarity before on the air use SUPER > > Not sure about the higher speed ,would that be resampling the 11025 > at a different rate ?? Bob, the higher speed is due to the fact that the audio samples are not coming from the sound card, at 11025 samples each second, but from a file. The actual speed is determined in this case from the time spent in processing, and from the time it takes to read from disk. Of course, the original audio recording on disk must have been done at 11025 samples per second. As I said, V0.94 of Jason can read WAV files, thanks to Stewart KK7KA, but is not capable of recording yet. This is left to V0.95. To record, you can use one of the many utilities found on Internet. I recommend Cool Edit, a very powerful and easy to use package. 73 Alberto I2PHD