Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7640 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2002 16:34:50 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 16 Jul 2002 16:34:50 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 6106 invoked by uid 10001); 16 Jul 2002 16:38:46 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 16 Jul 2002 16:38:45 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17UVDu-00020z-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 17:30:50 +0100 Received: from mailsrv.otenet.gr ([195.170.0.5]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17UVDt-00020u-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 17:30:49 +0100 Received: from otenet.gr (myti530-a105.otenet.gr [212.205.251.233]) by mailsrv.otenet.gr (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g6GGUG20009010 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 19:30:47 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <3D344924.1794B335@otenet.gr> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 17:26:13 +0100 From: "Alex Deligiannis" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en,el MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: Activity from DLF?s 360m mast References: <003001c22c3d$9fbd3680$5f74ccd4@DEFAULT> <5.1.0.14.0.20020716150706.00b88cf8@pb623250.kuleuven.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-7; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: I agree with Rik it's a great opportunity to make some measurements with a real aerial... I'll try to take a day off from my QRL I don't want to mist the event. Please let me know the QRG... 73's ALEX SV8QG KM39GC Rik Strobbe wrote: > I don't think it is a matter of impressing someone but just of taking a > chance to experiment, and isn't this what LF is all about ? > Nobody is obliged to participate and the activity is very restricted in > time, so apart from one or two "wounded ego's" no harm will be done. > Good luck to Walter and his gang ... > > 73, Rik ON7YD > > PS : Keeping in mind the RX problems at "big antenna" sites that occured in > the past it might be useful to have a RX site at some distance (1..2 km) > > At 13:26 16/07/2002 +0100, you wrote: > >Hello LF'ers, > >And you will still not be ( Or ever will be ) as potentialy efficient as > >MM0ALM Dave Nr Stonehaven ever was! If you have to use the aid of Commercial > >Masts, Tower Blocks, Computer DATA, Remote Links and Repeater Networks or > >Gateways... THEN WHY BOTHER AT ALL? It's one big farse and you lot are not > >impressing anybody one iota. > > > >Regards & Best Wishes > >Roy > >GM0PYC