Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12861 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2002 23:19:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 9 Mar 2002 23:19:44 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 2170 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2002 23:19:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 9 Mar 2002 23:19:41 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16jrZk-0006vX-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2002 00:52:36 +0000 Received: from mail.sitestar.net.234.160.205.in-addr.arpa ([205.160.234.8] helo=mail2.sitestar.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16jrZj-0006vS-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2002 00:52:35 +0000 Received: from sitestar.net [216.8.6.32] by mail2.sitestar.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id A821636E0152; Sat, 09 Mar 2002 18:17:53 -0500 Message-ID: <3C8A9837.11886121@sitestar.net> Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 18:18:15 -0500 From: "Rye Gewalt" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: RE: Re. Loops References: <16a.9f5fd1c.29ba58a6@aol.com> <3C89165E.D916DDDB@netscapeonline.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Declude-Sender: ryeg@sitestar.net [216.8.6.32] Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Surgical Rubber Tubing seems to work good and is what the commercial "sling shots" use here in the states. Rye K9LCJ gii3kev wrote: > WarmSpgs@aol.com wrote: > > > W. Ashlock writes: > > << ...anything is possible (including nailing the neighbors; so be careful!). > > >> > > > > But Bill--that's half the fun of using the archery method! (grin) > > > > You know, we could be in for a big bow-and-arrow versus catapult controversy > > here. > > How about a cross bow, that might be even better. The cannon seems more popular > in West Virginia. It depends where you live and what you can get hold of to > launch a rope over these high trees. Good catapults are hard to get these days, > especially good flexible elastic or rubber. Most synthetic rubber substances > these days do not have the elasticity. Years ago old bicycle inner tubes made > good catapults but modern tubes only stretch a couple of inches. > Does anyone have any ideas of a source of good elastic etc. > With the bow I suppose the arrow is the secret, it needs a good heavy tip to > carry it over the trees. > G3KEV > > > > > > > It would be like having to choose whether one is on the side of Robin Hood or > > the Sheriff of Nottingham. > > > > 73, > > John KD4IDY