Message-ID: <3C5EBB68.73737BD2@netscapeonline.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 16:48:41 +0000
From: "gii3kev" <gii3kev@netscapeonline.co.uk>
Organization: Netscape Online member
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: QRSS...... Giulio
References: <001b01c1ad07$bc7bf0a0$6241073e@default> <3C5E75D7.B3018236@diolog.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>


Fabian Kurz wrote:

> > I can often see traces of weak CW stations which are not read in the UK, but
> > which would be 'O' copy on QRSS even at 3 sec dots. Unfortunately QRSS got a
> > lot of 'bad press' about a year ago and many stopped sending it, maybe it
> > has 'come in from the cold' with the successes across the 'pond' and will
> > become used more often now.
>
> Anyone wants to try a sked with me in QRSS? I already reached all the stations
> that can hear me in normal-CW (with my ca. 10mW ERP), but guess there is still a
> lot to work in QRSS.
> Just drop me a line .. dj1yfk@darc.de

Hello Fabian.
We have worked before xband 136/7025 khz normal cw but I will QAP for you.
 What QRG and QTR ? I can reply either on normal cw or QRS Try tonight if you like.
de Mal/G3KEV/IO94SH


>
>
> 73, Fabian dj1yfk