Return-Path: Received: (qmail 602 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2002 13:02:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 23 Jan 2002 13:02:06 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 18443 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2002 13:02:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 23 Jan 2002 13:02:06 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16TN0l-0000wh-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:00:19 +0000 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.101]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16TN0k-0000wF-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:00:18 +0000 Received: from northrelay01.pok.ibm.com (northrelay01.pok.ibm.com [9.117.200.21]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA433244 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 07:55:55 -0500 Received: from usa.net (ss6.bld.socks.ibm.com [9.14.4.71]) by northrelay01.pok.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO v5.01) with ESMTP id g0NCwti101128 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 07:58:56 -0500 Message-ID: <3C4EB37C.1DE72C84@usa.net> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:58:36 +0100 From: "Alberto di Bene" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: Radiated power References: <3.0.5.32.20020122110006.009b6630@pop3.esoterica.pt> <5.1.0.14.0.20020123072004.00af8730@POP2.sympatico.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Larry Kayser wrote: > If you can get the 51, grab it, if you can get the 52, 53 or 54 grab the > highest number you can. each one is better than my 9250. The higher > numbers let you use a lower reference frequency for controlling a higher > output frequency , ie much greater than .45 of the reference frequency for > the 9250. > I have in my drawer an AD9854, obtained as sample from Analog Device. Problem is, I am horrified at the very thought of having to produce a PCB for it, let alone soldering it.... SMD make life difficult for the hobbyists, I am afraid.....:-( 73 Alberto I2PHD