Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2242 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2002 17:34:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by exhibition.plus.net with SMTP; 16 Jan 2002 17:34:23 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 8477 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2002 17:34:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 16 Jan 2002 17:34:03 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16QtoV-0007Yf-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 17:25:27 +0000 Received: from d06lmsgate-4.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.4]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16QtoU-0007Ya-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 17:25:26 +0000 Received: from d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.166.84.148]) by d06lmsgate-4.uk.ibm.COM (1.0.0) with ESMTP id RAA121290 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 17:11:13 GMT Received: from usa.net (ss5.bld.socks.ibm.com [9.14.4.70]) by d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO v5.01) with ESMTP id g0GHLrF119114 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 17:21:56 GMT Message-ID: <3C45B71C.6A4B7E09@usa.net> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 18:23:40 +0100 From: "Alberto di Bene" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: Jason test References: <005601c19e0f$02d50ee0$1700a8c0@home> <3C45AD94.A920B8FC@usa.net> <001a01c19eaf$d828c320$1700a8c0@home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dave Pick wrote: > Alberto and all. > > Yes I will transmit for one hour from 2000 utc on 137.520 using Jason 0.91 > in "Slow" mode. > I have put the software on my web-site in case QSL.net is too busy. > http://www.wireless.org.uk/jason.htm > Dave, thanks, also for mirroring the software. Qsl.net seems to be rather slow these days. When you transmit, the Normal and Slow settings are perfectly equivalent. The speed setting affects only the Rx side, as it reduces the number of FFTs done each second. It would be interesting to receive at the same time the same transmission, with two PCs, one set to Normal, and the other set to Slow, to see if the decoding accuracy worsens with the Slow setting... 73 Alberto I2PHD