Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19663 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2002 12:45:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 15 Jan 2002 12:45:54 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 22587 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2002 12:45:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 15 Jan 2002 12:45:59 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16QStL-00037V-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:40:39 +0000 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.101]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16QStI-00037N-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:40:38 +0000 Received: from northrelay01.pok.ibm.com (northrelay01.pok.ibm.com [9.117.200.21]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA112310 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 07:36:16 -0500 Received: from usa.net (ss10.raleigh.ibm.com [9.37.2.197]) by northrelay01.pok.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO v5.01) with ESMTP id g0FCdEf65968 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 07:39:14 -0500 Message-ID: <3C4422E5.C0367907@usa.net> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 13:39:01 +0100 From: "Alberto di Bene" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: Introducing Jason - and asking for cooperation References: <3C4301BD.878E49BF@usa.net> <006b01c19d34$ad33d500$979a17d2@steve> <001801c19d4c$78f9d9c0$1700a8c0@home> <3C43FE2C.49EE902A@usa.net> <000401c19db2$0de78220$1700a8c0@home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dave Pick wrote: > Thanks Alberto. > > I tried the 850MHz P3 laptop and it works fine. Obviously the 200MHz machine > is not good enough, I will have to upgrade the shack computer :-( Hello Dave, thanks. Glad that it worked ! I was fearing that my successful tests were only a dream, caused by too much Chianti wine :-) If you agree, I will produce a slowed down version to test on your 200 MHz PC, also to check how the decoding worsens with respect to the faster version. I suspect that many OMs still have PCs in the 166 - 200 MHz range, so a version for this kind of PC could be appropriate. For the Loran lines, in principle I could implement a logical filter, where you click on the spur line, and that frequency will then be ignored by the decoding algorithm. But this would not work if the spur frequency coincides with one of the slots.... I don't see an easy solution, but am open to suggestions. Well, if you want to make a test transmission this evening, I will check that frequency. But maybe a low power beacon would not make it to Italy... let me know please if and when you will transmit, thanks. ---- Rik Strobbe wrote: > I just read the Jason documentation. It looks most interesting and > promising, although there is some chance that some will call it 'pocks' ... > as 7FSK was called 'measles' ;-) Hi Rik, in this moment I am in my office at work, and don't have here an English dictionary, so don't exactly know what a 'pock' is... but, as Steve Olney said, there always will be some 'argue-naughty' around.. :-) But they are easily handled : just ignore them ... ;-) > For transmitting Jason I was thinking of an alternative path, using a PLL > and let Jason control the divider (via LPT of COM port). Your proposals look interesting, and, if someone will build the hardware, I am willing to add this new interfacing mode. Just let's agree on the details. 73 Alberto I2PHD