Message-ID: <3C333629.A7900B18@netscapeonline.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 16:32:41 +0000
From: "gii3kev" <gii3kev@netscapeonline.co.uk>
Organization: Netscape Online member
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: speed/qso
References: <3.0.1.16.20020102143211.2bdf3448@pb623250.kuleuven.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>


Rik Strobbe wrote:

> At 16:57 29/12/01 +0000, G3KEV wrote:
> >In spite of the slow qrs speed the duration of each qso was reasonably
> >quick.
> >QSO using 60 sec dots - took 60 mins approx to complete including
> >callsign and RO acks.
> >                   3  sec dots -           3 mins
> >                   2  sec dots-            2 mins
> >                   1  sec dots-             Althought John copied some
> >of the callsign the limitations of ARGO at this speed, hand sent speed,
> >did not permit a proper xband QSO. The dots and dashes were connected up
> >and virtually unreadable, Johns comment. .
>
> Hello Mal,
>
> very glad to see that your successes in QRSS, congrats for the crosband QSOs.
> I am just a bit puzzled by the QSO times given by you as just transmitting
> your call (G3KEV) at 1 min/dot would take 58 minutes (50 minutes if you use
> a 2/1 dash to dot ratio).
> Maybe since January 1st there is a 3/1 conversion rate between the UK
> minute and the Euro minute ;-)
>
> But the main thing is that you made the QSO, regardless wether it took 1, 2
> ot 3 hours. Once again my congrats to you nad John.
>
> 73, Rik  ON7YD

Thanks Rik for the info.
It took the minimun time, only one callsign was necessary at each dot length
using 2:1 ratio because the boys across the Atlantic had perfect coyp on my
signal every night so far.
The above times quoted are CORRECT.
I did not have to repeat anything twice etc therefore the qso times were Minimum
as stated.
I hope you now have the facts correct
de Mal/G3KEV