Message-ID: <3C320FA4.530ED231@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 14:36:05 -0500
From: "john currie" <john.currie@ns.sympatico.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Re: waste
References: <200112311645.fBVGjQ808427@smtp.wanadoo.nl> <3.0.5.32.20011231212346.00988c60@pop3.esoterica.pt>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Noise
VE1ZJ
Brian Rogerson wrote:

> I wish I could have expressed this so well in Italian.  Perhaps
> Steve could do it for us from down under:-).  Surely you could
> even run six QRSS signals through the middle of the sequential
> D2T M7F without a problem.  If I can read it cleanly here
> why is there a problem over the water?  Surely not receiver
> blocking?
> 73 Brian
>
> At 18:32 31/12/2001 +0100, you wrote:
> >>From the screen capture I posted in a previous message
> >this morning, it is quite evident that yesterday evening
> >the band was crowded, but NO-ONE stepped on the
> >toes of another.  The signals were all quite identifiable,
> >being disjointed in frequency.
> >
> >While myself think that the 7FSK is not optimal, nevertheless
> >it is a first step to leave behind our shoulders the CW, the
> >son of the spark transmitters. For weak-signal work, more
> >modern coding schemes must be used, based on the current
> >status of the information theory. And, having myself been a CW
> >operator for many years, I do recognize its charm, but I am
> >afraid it is a charm based on nostalgy...
> >In this world there must be ample space for nostalgy, but
> >nostalgy should not mean nor imply immobility or ultra-conservatism.
> >
> >Just my 2 cents of Euro (what an appropriate time...:-)
> >
> >73  Alberto  I2PHD
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 73 Brian     CT1DRP     IN51QD     41 09 58N  08 39 11W
> http://homepage.esoterica.pt/~brian