Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25453 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2001 04:04:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 18 Dec 2001 04:04:16 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 23417 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2001 04:04:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 18 Dec 2001 04:04:21 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16GBM8-0008Se-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 03:55:52 +0000 Received: from europa.your-site.com ([140.186.45.14]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16GBM7-0008SZ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 03:55:51 +0000 Received: from att.net ([166.82.180.100]) by europa.your-site.com ; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 22:55:05 -0500 Message-ID: <3C1EBE1B.18BDA650@att.net> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 03:55:07 +0000 From: "Dexter McIntyre W4DEX" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: 73 kHz 17 Dec References: <3C1ED9FA.4E31E3B8@ns.sympatico.ca> <001b01c18767$bedcb0c0$0300a8c0@charter.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Laurie's signal is detectable here in NC tonight. I arrived home several hours after dark so I got a late start. Noise is running about 5 db above the level I noted when Laurie's signal was Q5. A fast moving front with heavy rain just passed but there is very little QRN, just higher noise. If the noise would drop by 5 db I think Laurie's signal would be Q5. Dexter John Andrews wrote: > > Have been seeing Laurie all evening -- not overpowering, but copyable with > Argo's 120 sec/dot screen. Am presently set so that Peter would be visible, > but nothing has shown thus far. We have an ice storm in progress here, so > receiving conditions may not be optimal. Will leave it running overnight. > > John Andrews, W1TAG