Return-Path: <majordom@post.thorcom.com> Received: (qmail 29334 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2001 22:33:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 24 Nov 2001 22:33:36 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 15125 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2001 22:33:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 24 Nov 2001 22:33:55 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 167lJy-0003rp-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 22:30:50 +0000 Received: from mta43-acc.tin.it ([212.216.176.239] helo=fep43-svc.tin.it) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 167lJx-0003rk-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 22:30:49 +0000 Received: from dii.unisi.it ([212.171.197.250]) by fep43-svc.tin.it (InterMail vM.4.01.03.13 201-229-121-113) with ESMTP id <20011124222952.PUGQ3377.fep43-svc.tin.it@dii.unisi.it> for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 23:29:52 +0100 Message-ID: <3C001E60.CB914048@dii.unisi.it> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 23:25:36 +0100 From: "VALERIO" <valerio@dii.unisi.it> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.7 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: IK5/TEST References: <3BFE715C.32179C3D@netscapeonline.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com> gii3kev wrote: > > I heard IK5ZPV testing on 136 khz last evening at 2212 utc with a very > strong signal S8. He did not appear to be listening, no cq etc. Condx > seemed very good last night and some of the commercial stations were > around 6db above normal around the 136 khz freq area. Perhaps 136 would > have been a better bet last night for transatlantic rather than 73 khz. > G3KEV Mal, thank you for report, but no rx at moment in my new (and cold) shack. I'm waiting for a baby, so no more room for radio in my home, only in the field. I made some transmission test for Italian sations(IK7-IS0) interested in developing 136 kHz activity. '73, Valerio (IK5ZPV)