Message-ID: <3C0011CB.3156569C@att.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 16:31:55 -0500
From: "Dexter McIntyre W4DEX" <dmcintyre@att.net>
Organization: JDM Communications
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: 73kHz/136kHz
References: <4f.14ca23c4.293040de@aol.com> <007401c174d6$fc38f8a0$a3ca28c3@ericadodd> <001501c174ec$f212b260$0300a8c0@charter.net> <000201c1751b$6063bb00$3dce28c3@ericadodd> <3C000DE3.AED73455@att.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Just for grins, I recorded a 15 sec .wav file of the 73.3 kHz RTTY
signal and uploaded it at:

www.qsl.net/w4dex/73khzRTTY.wav

File size is about 244 kb.

Dexter 

Dexter McIntyre W4DEX wrote:
> 
> g3ldo wrote:
>  Would it be possible for as many
> > stations on your side of the Atlantic to monitor the RTTY station at Rugby
> > on 73.3kHz during the CME disturbance - we have very little knowledge of
> > T/A propagation on this band.
> >
> 
> Peter,
> 
> At 2100 hrs I am receiving a good RTTY signal on 73.3 kHz.  Since this
> is the first time I have listened for this transmission I have no
> reference to judge it's current signal strength.  It sounds strong
> enough I almost believe it would print here if the static crashes were
> absent.
> 
> Last night was a complete wipe out for my 73 kHz reception due to
> thunder storms in the area.  Tonight will be even worse but the much
> needed rain is well welcomed.
> 
> Dexter, W4DEX