Message-ID: <3BFA27F6.9EA0AB2F@netscapeonline.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 09:52:54 +0000
From: "gii3kev" <gii3kev@netscapeonline.co.uk>
Organization: Netscape Online member
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: RF AMPS
References: <3.0.1.16.20011120100913.2c1f42ee@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>


Rik Strobbe wrote:

> Hello Mal & group,
>
> >Some LF operators are indicating that they are getting large RF amperage
> >into their loading coil/antennas systems for very low power output to
> >the antenna ie a few 100 watts.
> The current you can push through your antenna system depends on the loss
> resistance you encounter. And this is more than just the ground loss. There
> is also the loss in the loadingcoil and in many cases also a considerable
> loss in the 'environement' ie. objects such as trees and buildings near the
> antenna.
> Up to a certain level one can reduce the losses, by using a high-Q
> loadingcoil and a good groundsystem (radials and earthpoles).
> The loss resistance (on 136kHz) can go from a few Ohm (on a metal vessel at
> sea) over a few tens Ohm (good conducting ground) to a few hundred Ohm
> (poor soil, many obstacles near the antenna).
> So this means that for 200W output power the antenna current can go from
> 10A (ie. on a metal vessel at sea) down to 1A (poor soil, many obstacles).
> >From what I have read on this reflector the loss resistance for 'amateur
> antenna systems' goes from 20 Ohm up to 150 Ohm.
>
> >I am trying to figure out what procedure they are using to measure the
> >rf amps and where all the rf is going because the signals heard on LF
> >are low to average around the UK and in EU.
> Antenna current is only one thing that determines your ERP, the other thing
> is the radiation resistance of the antenna. For a 'pure vertical' (no
> toploading) the rad. res. on 136kHz (in milli-Ohm) = 0.08 x h^2 (h =
> antenna height in m). Toploading can quadruple the rad. res. (in you ave
> infinite toploading), in practical cases toploading will double ... triple
> the rad. res.
>
> >My system is designed for 50 ohms throughout and matched accordingly at
> >the base of the antenna via a coil with max of 400 microH.
> Since the resistance you measure is for 99% (or more) the loss resistance I
> would recommend to design the antenna for least resistance and match it to
> 50 Ohm using a transformer of L-C circuit.
>
> >Maybe most are heating up the ground around the antenna, and the loading
> >coil ,whereas my couple of amps are being radiated by the antenna.
> Sorry to have to dissapoint you, but I'm afraid that also you use over 99%
> of your power to heat the coil and soil. Even with a really big antenna
> (lets' say 40m high and well toploaded) the rad. res. will not exceed a few
> hundred milli-Ohms will you loss resistance most likely will be in the
> range of several tens of ohms. A wild gues would be a rad. res of 0.3 Ohm
> and a loss of 50 Ohm, meaning that only 0.6% of the power is radiated (and
> thus 99.4% is heated).
> But with the antenna system described here and a 400W TX (= 2.8A
> antennacurrent) the ERP would be 4.4W, well exceeding CEPT limits ... to
> stick to 1W ERP the TX power should be limited to 90W.
>
> >Maybe someone knows the answer.
> The above is only my limited knowledge
>
> 73, Rik

Rik.
I know all of this, you did not answer the question. What method and where in
the system is the RF being measured, ie top of coil, cold end of coil, at the
tx output etc.
I have seen rf measured at different points in a system and all the readings
are different with a thermo couple RF ammeter.
Some systems are not designed for 50 ohms, and the antenna tapped up and down a
PA coil for maximum SMOKE regardless of SWR, so you never know really where you
are with measurements, they are just relative. I have also seen matched 50 ohm
systems indicate more RF current output when detuned from resonance. It would
appear that the thermo couple ammeter must be getting enhancement current (more
heat) from the higher SWR.
I know for a fact that some are using both the above methods and that is why I
asked what methods are being  used by some that are getting such high amperage
for low power.
Those using other devices other than thermo-couple rf ammeters might not see
this effect.
You missed the point completely about what I was asking, and it can only be
answered by those getting these very high rf currents to the antenna, except of
course they are running a lot more power than they admit. I suppose with all
the Decca Jeeps about there must be a lot of high power stations on the air on
LF.
G3KEV