Return-Path: Received: (qmail 863 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2001 18:40:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 16 Oct 2001 18:40:01 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 5933 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2001 18:38:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 16 Oct 2001 18:38:41 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 15tYgj-0000XU-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 19:11:37 +0100 Received: from mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk ([194.201.52.152]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 15tYgi-0000XP-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 19:11:36 +0100 Received: from ldsas15-79-130-45.cw-visp.com ([212.137.130.45] helo=netscapeonline.co.uk) by mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 15tYX0-0005oB-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 18:01:35 +0000 Message-ID: <3BCC65B4.35E96A0C@netscapeonline.co.uk> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 17:52:04 +0100 From: "gii3kev" Organization: Netscape Online member X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: Mal on Repeaters References: <3BCB18E9.B3067E26@netscapeonline.co.uk> <005001c155d5$0574cbe0$0a00a8c0@ThreeLakes.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Larry Kayser wrote: > Dennis, thanks for relaying the text of a message sent by Mal. I do not see > Mal's stuff anymore, I solved that a long time ago. > > For the record......................... > > > I hope those using such a system including our friend in Canada who > > confesses to using vhf/uhf links for LF and HF linking does not claim > > any AWARDS. I hope the recent transatlantic claims do not include any > > linking of any kind but genuine contacts on the 136 khz band from the > > home qth, where the LF tx/rx is located. > > Certainly I used my remote system for the LF QSO across the North Atlantic. > I am not stupid enough to tie an additonal arm behind my back when I have > such a facility I have built available to me. > > > Please do not call/work me via the repeater. > > Mal, if we were the two last amateurs in the world, I would never hear your > signal, not if you were parked on my front dock with a megawatt of spark, I > would never hear or acknowledge your signal. I promise you I will never > call you on the air, never. There are very few things I will say that I > would never do, not under any circumstances, never, but QSO you would be one > of the things I can safely say I would never do. Have complete faith in > this Mal, you can take it to the bank - NEVER. > > This has been a long time coming Mal, now you have it officially - NEVER. > > Larry > VA3LK NICE REPLY - Its just that a proper qso to me means door to door on the appropriate band, in this case LF 136 khz and not via vhf/uhf links, repeaters etc, also a qso must take place at one session and not in bits and pieces over several days or weeks or years. I am glad you have clarified your position otherwise had I worked you I would have been disappointed to find that you used various vhf/uhf routes and I would not CLAIM a qso. Are there any other radio amateurs in Canada or do you have a friend that I could work ??? G3KEV