Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29688 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2001 11:31:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 8 Oct 2001 11:31:10 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 19660 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2001 11:30:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 8 Oct 2001 11:30:57 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15qYXc-0006gY-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2001 12:25:48 +0100 Received: from e21.nc.us.ibm.com ([32.97.136.227]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15qYXb-0006gT-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2001 12:25:47 +0100 Received: from southrelay01.raleigh.ibm.com (southrelay01.raleigh.ibm.com [9.37.3.208]) by e21.nc.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA192488 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 06:22:10 -0500 Received: from usa.net (ss7.bld.socks.ibm.com [9.14.4.72]) by southrelay01.raleigh.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO v4.97.1) with ESMTP id f98BOXL126678 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 07:24:34 -0400 Message-ID: <3BC18CE0.51835705@usa.net> Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 13:24:16 +0200 From: "Alberto di Bene" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: New Spectran V 1 References: <14d.213bcd6.28f00555@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: DL4YHF@aol.com wrote: > Hello Alberto, Vittorio, and group, > > Curious as I am, I immediately installed the brand new Spectran V1 b106 this morning and was > amazed of the performance and stability of it. Whatever I tried, I didn't get it to crash... ;-) > The scrolling is indeed very smooth, the automated detection of the signal paths inside the > soundcard worked right from the beginning, and the DSP denoiser makes listening on HF a pleasure > (I didn't use it on LF yet). > > Good job ! Hello Wolf, thanks for the report, expecially as it is coming from, ehm.., the 'competition'.. :-) But, seriously, the target audiences of Spectran and your excellent SpecLab are a bit different. Spectran is geared towards the end user, while yours is more oriented to people that know how to specify, let's say, the coefficients of an IIR or FIR filter. So perhaps there is no a real competition, having the two programs different goals. Very glad you haven't been able (so far) to crash it, but I would be even more glad if you could... that would mean that you have found one of the undoubtely many bugs that are lurking inside the program, just waiting to be awakened... TNX es 73 Alberto I2PHD