Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15019 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2001 07:12:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 6 Oct 2001 07:12:22 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 12342 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2001 07:10:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 6 Oct 2001 07:10:06 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15plU7-0002Oc-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2001 08:02:55 +0100 Received: from anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.92]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15plU6-0002OX-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2001 08:02:54 +0100 Received: from alg.demon.co.uk ([194.222.171.80]) by anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 15plTR-000MLX-0Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 6 Oct 2001 08:02:13 +0100 Message-ID: <3BBEAE42.8040DCF7@alg.demon.co.uk> Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 08:09:54 +0100 From: "Steve Rawlings" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: Morse on 136k References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Jim wrote: > Well, maybe not then - but interestingly, I note from the schedule for > the new "Foundation" M2xxx licence on the RSGB web site, that holders > of the Foundation licence will be allowed to run the full 1W ERP on > 136kHz. So now it's official - you don't need to pass the morse test > to operate on LF... As far as operation on longwave is concerned, I am concerned that this form of licencing presents unacceptable safety risks. I have written to the RA asking them to reconsider the inclusion of 136 kHz. Regards to all, Steve GW4ALG