Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23498 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2001 18:28:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 26 Sep 2001 18:28:57 -0000 X-Priority: 3 Received: (qmail 18863 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2001 18:28:36 -0000 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 26 Sep 2001 18:28:36 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15mJIX-0004op-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 19:20:41 +0100 Received: from mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk ([194.201.52.152]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15mJIW-0004ok-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 19:20:40 +0100 Received: from ldsas10-74-125-223.cw-visp.com ([212.137.125.223] helo=netscapeonline.co.uk) by mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 15mJ9J-0005Zq-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 18:11:09 +0000 Message-ID: <3BB20E55.AC4F9DA7@netscapeonline.co.uk> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 18:20:21 +0100 From: "gii3kev" Organization: Netscape Online member X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "rsgb rsgb" Subject: LF: ic706 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi All Lots of info floating around about the 706 and different versions. I have a late mk1 model and it works fb and I use it as a generator source to drive my 73/136 pa. I use it on 7.3/13.6 mhz low power and divide by 100 for the appropriate lf bands. It is very stable on tx and works well also on RX 136 but I have a large antenna. I did say earlier that on a small antenna it is not sensitive enough. I compared it with other rigs like the ts50 for example on a short antenna in the early days and it was not very good. When I put the big antenna up then it was more than adequate with the pre amp on. The ts50 was too sensitive on the big antenna and needed external attenuation. I have other receivers available as mentioned in previous messages and all are very good but it depends a lot on the antenna in use as regards sensitivity. What would suit one persons needs would not suit another. Using the 706 with my present antenna, the rf gain has to be backed off slightly to obtain max signal over noise but has more than adequate sensitivity. The antenna will determine what rx suits your needs best. 73 de Mal/G3KEV/SCARBOROUGH