Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12986 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2001 15:46:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 15:46:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 15255 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2001 15:44:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 15:44:24 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15cTta-0004nm-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 16:38:18 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk ([194.201.52.152]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15cTtZ-0004nh-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 16:38:17 +0100 Received: from ldsas01-65-116-180.cw-visp.com ([212.137.116.180] helo=netscapeonline.co.uk) by mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 15cTkq-0001Lt-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 15:29:16 +0000 Message-ID: <3B8E3202.A90CF7F1@netscapeonline.co.uk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:30:58 +0100 From: "gii3kev" Organization: Netscape Online member X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: Receiver References: <003e01c130d4$30973360$7798fea9@host.telepac.pt> <3B8E1787.4FB4EC0D@usa.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Alberto di Bene wrote: > José de Sá wrote: > > > What about the TS-870 or the Icom IC-746 ? I owned or still have most of the receivers you mention. The TS 850 is a good rx on LF and so is the TS50 and TS570 with the appropriate IF filters. Other makes that are acceptable are the FT1000, IC746, IC706 and FT847 Others I do not know about because I have never tried them. With large antennas all the above are good with smaller antennas there might be a sensitivity problem. In my case I have adequate sensitivity because of the fairly large antenna system. With suitable filters the TS850/TS50 and TS 570 are good on 136 khz and comparable are the FT1000 and IC746. The IC706 will just about manage with the pre amp ON with a large antenna and an external audio DSP filter. With smaller antennas the IC706 is barely sensitive enough. The FT 847 although useable suffers from overload, but with some attenuation and juggling it works. All of the above receivers are good enough with a good antenna for 136 khz and a lot depends on the OPERATOR regardless of specification. You must have the necessary narrow cw filters for maximum performance on all the above receivers. If you need 73 khz then you are more limited for choice as most do not cover that frequency. > G3KEV > > > > Jose CT1EEB > > > > According to the Kenwood specs, the TS-850 is rated at 0.2 uV for > 10 dB (S+N)/N at 100 kHz. > > The TS-870 has a rating of only 1 uV in the same conditions. > > Don't have numbers for the IC-746, but a friend OM that owns one > tells me that it is deaf as a doorknob on the LF band. > > 73 Alberto I2PHD