Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17069 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2001 08:48:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Jun 2001 08:48:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 24335 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2001 08:47:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 1 Jun 2001 08:47:43 -0000 X-Priority: 3 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 155kKx-0004C4-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2001 09:31:15 +0100 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from tele-post-20.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.20]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 155kKv-0004Bz-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2001 09:31:13 +0100 Received: from alg.demon.co.uk ([194.222.171.80]) by tele-post-20.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 155kK5-000BQq-0K for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 08:30:23 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3B175274.96A50DE6@alg.demon.co.uk> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 09:29:40 +0100 From: "Steve Rawlings" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: new LFers, contests, etc. References: <22.16aa6566.28424f25@aol.com> <001a01c0ea1b$593165c0$44ca28c3@ericadodd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi All, I have observed that: 1) there are many operators within the LF community who are sufficiently self-motivated to put out CQ calls on 136 kHz without having to make a contest out of it; and, 2) the Emails in support of contests on 136 kHz have, in the main, been sent by those who are never heard on the band. I suppose the real test is this: Would a contest on 136 kHz get those in favour of LF contests (but who never/rarely venture on the band), to plug in the key and help provide some signals for newcomers. In my view, the alternative suggestion by Peter G3LDO of an activity event along the lines of the Worthing Radio Club (and, perhaps, the G-QRP Club Winter Sports) events is a good one. [The G-QRP Club event is a very casual affair. There are no points; no multipliers. Instead, the G4DQP Trophy is awarded to the 'best log' as judged by Peter Barville G3XJS, the G-QRP Club Contests Manager. The judging is just as casual - often based on qualitative factors such as: - equipment (is it homebrew/unusual etc.); - antennas (indoor [!]/limited space); - power used and results achieved (it doesn't have to be DX); and, - whether the operator has promoted activity by his/her presence.] Contests and activity events apart, more still needs to be done to increase the chances of hearing other stations on a day-to-day basis. Rich OM2TW has already reported his own efforts to increase the awareness of LF through magazine articles, and setting up demonstration stations. I know that Dick PA0SE has done many presentations about LF to groups of radio amateurs. Indeed, largely through the initiative of PA0SE, the '136 Activity Periods' on Saturday and Sunday mornings have become quite well-known. But those looking for QSOs during the week still find it hard to make QSOs. The problem would seem to be this: Even those at home all day can't spend all their time calling CQ or spinning the dial listening for other stations! Arising out of discussions with Dave G3YMC and Bob G8RW, we would propose the adoption of '136 Activity Times': pre-defined times during the day there is a good chance of hearing other stations. We have discussed the possible establishment of 136 Activity Times at even hours UTC through the day (say, 06:00; 08:00; 10:00 . . . .). Weekends included. What do others feel about this idea? Perhaps the establishment of activity times, and Peter's activity events (in addition to the existing activity periods) would obviate the need for contests, and those wasteful beacons? All supported by publicity, of course. Regards to all, Steve GW4ALG