From: "Mike Dennison" <mike.dennison@rsgb.org.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 12:06:36 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: LF: Re: LF Prop.
Message-ID: <3B03BECC.20798.9BB358@localhost>
In-reply-to: <000201c0deb5$c2989400$ebca28c3@ericadodd>
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

G3LDO wrote:
> There is this thing called LUF (Lowest Usable Frequency). Not much in ham
> literature about it but from Bill Orr's Radio Handbook it depends on
> transmitter erp and atmospheric noise. Generally speaking the LUF can be
> lowered (at HF) by approximately 2MHz for each 10dB increase in erp.
> However it is obvious that the LUF changes throughout the day. Does it
> follow the MUF? If it does then it will follow the sunspot cycle.
> Are there any average graphs of LUF?

My understanding is that  LUF and MUF are purely F-layer functions, so are 
not relevant to us if you accept Alan's assumption that sky-wave propagation 
is by D-layer with perhaps some E-layer. Also, is the MUF really measured? It 
will change for every path, and for prediction purposes is usually calculated 
from the Critical Frequency (ie the point at which the signals go straight 
through the ionosphere). Perhaps LUF is also just a calculation.


Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT)
http://www.lf.thersgb.net