Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8809 invoked from network); 12 May 2001 15:54:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 12 May 2001 15:54:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 24700 invoked from network); 12 May 2001 15:54:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 12 May 2001 15:54:26 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14ybZq-0002lv-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 12 May 2001 16:45:06 +0100 Received: from finch-post-10.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.38]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14ybZp-0002lq-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 12 May 2001 16:45:05 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from alg.demon.co.uk ([194.222.171.80]) by finch-post-10.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 14ybZI-0002Gc-0A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 12 May 2001 15:44:33 +0000 Message-ID: <3AFD5932.9238FECE@alg.demon.co.uk> Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 16:39:30 +0100 From: "Steve Rawlings" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "LF Group" Subject: Re: LF: Measurement of antenna current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi All, Well, it's been drier in Chepstow this week, and we're having a gloriously sunny day today. So I've been doing some more antenna current measurements this afternoon. (If you're getting bored with this topic, I suggest that you delete this message now!) Today's test was intended to find out whether having aluminium foil under my loading coil makes any difference to the antenna current. For references purposes, my loading coil was set up in its usual place (no aluminium sheet): 1700 mm from the back wall of the house, and raised 400 mm above the patio. The current at the cold end of the loading coil was 2.0 A (0.2 A less than last weekend), and the current at the hot end was 1.8 A (same antenna current as last weekend). I then moved the loading coil to one side, and put down two strips of aluminium foil, each measuring 450 mm x 1600 mm. I left a gap of 30 mm between the strips, so the overall area covered measured 930 mm x 1600 mm. Four lengths of timber were then placed along the edges of the aluminium foil to hold it in position. I then replaced the loading coil in its original position, at the centre of the screened area, and 1700 mm from the wall, 400 mm above the aluminium. The wall end of both aluminium strips was then connected to antenna ground (leaving the far ends of each strip open circuit). For a picture of the set-up (taken from an upstairs room), see: http://www.alg.demon.co.uk/radio/136/pictures/screen_coil.jpg With the aluminium foil in position, the current at the cold end was 2.0 A, the current at the hot end was 1.8 A. (Interestingly, the use of the aluminium foil appeared to have no significant affect upon system resonance.) To recap from last week, I found no significant difference in the antenna current (1.8 A) - whether excess turns at the hot end of the coil were: - left connected, but open circuit; - left connected, but shorted; - disconnected from main winding; or, - physically removed from the coil former. This weekend, I found that the use of grounded aluminium foil under my loading coil made no significant difference to the antenna current. Also with, or without the aluminium foil, the current into the cold end of my loading coil this weekend is 0.2 A less than last weekend (was 2.2 A), while the antenna current remained the same (1.8 A). (A possible effect of the drier weather conditions?) By the way, I heard good signals at around 10:13 UT this morning from DF6NM (RST 539) and F6BWO (559). Regards to all, Steve GW4ALG